- #1
Well, no, as you wrote in the first paragraph MA would be equal and opposite to the sum of those two moments, hence anticlockwise.stockzahn said:EDIT: Sorry, I didn't look at the drawing well: The moment MA of course must be the sum of the moments produced by the force (1200 N) and the weight of the beam (both with clockwise direction).
the correct moment would be in clockwise direction , right ? the anticlockwise in merely the reaction of the moment produced which is in opposite direction , am i right ?haruspex said:Well, no, as you wrote in the first paragraph MA would be equal and opposite to the sum of those two moments, hence anticlockwise.
Anyway, it really doesn't matter which way it is presumed to be. MA could be taken to be clockwise, and the equations written accordingly. It would then turn out to have a negative value.
haruspex said:[] ... MA would be equal and opposite to the sum of those two moments, hence anticlockwise.
In the textbook extract you posted, MA is the reaction moment. Read it carefully. There is no error there.goldfish9776 said:the correct moment would be in clockwise direction , right ? the anticlockwise in merely the reaction of the moment produced which is in opposite direction , am i right ?
The direction of the moment at point A is clockwise.
The force acting at point A is 1200N.
The moment at point A is in a clockwise direction.
Yes, the direction of the moment at point A can change depending on the direction of the applied force.
The direction of the moment at point A can determine the rotation of the system. A clockwise moment will cause clockwise rotation, while a counterclockwise moment will cause counterclockwise rotation.