- #1
- 24,775
- 792
I personally don't follow braneworld cosmology, but there could be a thread about. It interests enough people here to have a discussion IMO
A possible thread-starter is a recent post by sol2
which has some beautiful images, or links thereto,
tho not necessarily directly connected to braneworld theories
and concludes with sol putting the question flat out: do you follow the theorizing about colliding braneworlds:
in my case the answer is no but hopefully others do and will reply
A possible thread-starter is a recent post by sol2
which has some beautiful images, or links thereto,
tho not necessarily directly connected to braneworld theories
and concludes with sol putting the question flat out: do you follow the theorizing about colliding braneworlds:
sol2 said:...
I have been developing well with this kind of information. I hope others will benefit too.
http://online.itp.ucsb.edu/online/plecture/thorne/oh/08.gif
Some will appreciate the understanding there, of all the maths. Klein's ordering of Geometires as they have been shown through Patricias link of what is required of String theory in terms of those maths would have been laying one over the other, but in the Bose Nova, a culmination?
With Omega, critical density must still play a part in our understanding of this dynamical world in the classical realities? But when it comes to QM, how shall we understand the issues presented in cosmology, might also speak to QM as well?
Do you "follow" Brane world collisions?
in my case the answer is no but hopefully others do and will reply