Disks, Shells, Washers- Calculus AB/BC

  • Thread starter Justabeginner
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Calculus
In summary: So, in each case, the absolute value is necessary.No, that's incorrect. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on an interval [a, b], then f(x) - g(x) ≥ 0 on the interval, so ## \int_a^b f(x) - g(x)~dx \geq 0.##In summary, Clamtrox helped me with the main equation and I solved it correctly with the help of CAF123. However, I still have some errors and I would appreciate some guidance on if my technique is correct or not. Thank you!
  • #1
Justabeginner
309
1

Homework Statement


Find the area bounded by the curves [itex] f(x)= x^3 + x^2 [/itex] and [itex] g(x)= 2x^2 + 2x [/itex].

Homework Equations


\int ((f(x)-g(x))^2)\, dx and \int ((g(x)-f(x))^2)\, dx

The Attempt at a Solution


I found out the intersection of f(x) and g(x) first. I think there are three points: -1, 0, and 2. I then set the a and b values for those integrals -1 and 0, and 0 and 2 respectively. I got -13pi/105 as the result of the first integral, and -11104pi/105 as the result of the second integral. Adding them up, I got 11117pi/105 and this is incorrect apparently. I would appreciate some guidance on if my technique is correct or not, or if I've just messed up a calculation. Thank you so much. :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How do you calculate the area between two curves? It should be A = ∫|f(x)-g(x)| dx, right? How, then, can you possibly get pi's in your answer?
 
  • #3
I did not realize that. Thank you for the clarification. I'll solve it in that way now.

I solved it in that method, and got 59/12 as my final answer, but it's not correct. o.0 Did I do something wrong?
 
  • #4
Yes you did, as is evident from the fact that your answer is wrong. However, it's terribly difficult to guess what your error may be, without seeing your working.
 
  • #5
Well my work involved solving the integral of f(x)-g(x) with a and b being -1 and 0 respectively and adding it to the integral of g(x)- f(x) with a and b being 0 and 2 respectively.

Oh wait, I didn't do the absolute value of that, just as you showed in the first post. Can you explain why you're using the absolute value? Because in other problems solved, since part of the equation was under the x-axis negative area was involved.

Doing it with the absolute value, I now get:

1/4* x^4 + 1/3* x^3 + x^2 (with a being -1 and be being 0)
11/12 - 0= 11/12

For the second part with a being 0 and b being 2, I get:

32/3- 0 = 32/3

Adding the two results, I get a new answer of 139/12.

This is STILL not right. I'm a bit frustrated, as I've literally done this about fifteen times, and I still can't get it. :/
 
  • #6
Justabeginner said:
Doing it with the absolute value, I now get:

1/4* x^4 + 1/3* x^3 + x^2 (with a being -1 and be being 0)*
11/12 - 0= 11/12
I think there are some sign errors in the line *

For the second part with a being 0 and b being 2, I get:

32/3- 0 = 32/3
I get something different - could you have a possible sign error again?
 
  • #7
I have returned with the right answer! And a better understanding of the approach. :D

Yes, CAF123, thank you- I did have a sign error.

For the left hand side I come out with 5/12 and for the right hand side, 8/3. Adding the two together, I get 37/12, which is correct!

And thank you Clamtrox for helping me with the main equation- I now see what my main mistake was!

I should really not get flustered and pay closer attention to my signs next time. -.-
 
  • #8
Justabeginner said:
Can you explain why you're using the absolute value?

Absolute value is there because there's no such thing as negative area. You should order the functions so that you subtract smaller from the larger value.
 
  • #9
You don't need the absolute value if you set each integral up correctly, and in some cases, using the absolute value will give you the wrong answer. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on [a, b], then the integrand should be f(x) - g(x). If f(x) ≤ g(x) on [b, c], then the integrand should be g(x) - f(x).
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
You don't need the absolute value if you set each integral up correctly, and in some cases, using the absolute value will give you the wrong answer. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on [a, b], then the integrand should be f(x) - g(x). If f(x) ≤ g(x) on [b, c], then the integrand should be g(x) - f(x).
In this case on ##[-1,0], f(x) \geq g(x)##, however ##\int_{-1}^0 f - g \,\,dx < 0 ##(because the majority of the region enclosed is below x axis), so in this case an abs value sign is needed.
 
  • #11
CAF123 said:
In this case on ##[-1,0], f(x) \geq g(x)##, however ##\int_{-1}^0 f - g \,\,dx < 0 ##(because the majority of the region enclosed is below x axis), so in this case an abs value sign is needed.
No, that's incorrect. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on an interval [a, b], then f(x) - g(x) ≥ 0 on the interval, so ## \int_a^b f(x) - g(x)~dx \geq 0.##

As a simple example of how this works, consider -2 and -4. -2 > -4 and -2 - (-4) = +2 > 0.
 
  • #12
clamtrox said:
Absolute value is there because there's no such thing as negative area. You should order the functions so that you subtract smaller from the larger value.

Yes, but in certain texts, I've seen the person solving the problem, say the area is negative simply because the area extends below the x-axis. o.0 Can you explain why that holds true in that case, or was it an error on their part?
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
No, that's incorrect. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on an interval [a, b], then f(x) - g(x) ≥ 0 on the interval, so ## \int_a^b f(x) - g(x)~dx \geq 0.##

As a simple example of how this works, consider -2 and -4. -2 > -4 and -2 - (-4) = +2 > 0.

That really cleared up some things. Thank you :)
 
  • #14
Mark44 said:
No, that's incorrect. If f(x) ≥ g(x) on an interval [a, b], then f(x) - g(x) ≥ 0 on the interval, so ## \int_a^b f(x) - g(x)~dx \geq 0.##

As a simple example of how this works, consider -2 and -4. -2 > -4 and -2 - (-4) = +2 > 0.

Yes, sorry Mark.
 
  • #15
Justabeginner said:
Yes, but in certain texts, I've seen the person solving the problem, say the area is negative simply because the area extends below the x-axis. o.0 Can you explain why that holds true in that case, or was it an error on their part?
Error on their part.
The value of an integral can be negative; e.g. ## \int_{-1}^1 x^2 - 1~ dx##,
but the area of a geometric region is always nonnegative.

If you're asked to find the area of the region that is bounded above by the x-axis and below by the graph of y = x2 - 1, you should get a positive number.
 
  • #16
I understand. Thank you so much for clarifying.
 

FAQ: Disks, Shells, Washers- Calculus AB/BC

What is the difference between disks, shells, and washers in calculus?

Disks, shells, and washers are all different methods for finding the volume of a solid of revolution in calculus. Disks involve slicing the solid perpendicular to the axis of rotation and summing the volume of each disk. Shells involve slicing the solid parallel to the axis of rotation and summing the volume of each cylindrical shell. Washers involve slicing the solid into thin washers and summing the volume of each washer.

When should I use disks, shells, or washers in my calculus problems?

The method you use depends on the shape of the solid of revolution. Disks are best used when the cross-sections of the solid are circles, shells are best used when the cross-sections are rectangles, and washers are best used when the cross-sections are annuli (rings).

How do I set up the integrals for disks, shells, and washers in calculus?

To set up the integral for disks, you will need to use the formula V = π∫(R(x))^2 dx, where R(x) is the radius of the disk at a given point along the axis of rotation. To set up the integral for shells, you will need to use the formula V = 2π∫R(x)h(x) dx, where R(x) is the distance from the axis of rotation to the edge of the shell and h(x) is the height of the shell. To set up the integral for washers, you will need to use the formula V = π∫(R2(x) - R1(x))^2 dx, where R2(x) is the outer radius of the washer and R1(x) is the inner radius of the washer.

Can I use disks, shells, and washers to find the volume of any solid of revolution?

Yes, disks, shells, and washers can be used to find the volume of any solid of revolution, as long as the cross-sections of the solid can be represented by a circle, rectangle, or annulus.

Are there any shortcuts or tricks for solving problems involving disks, shells, and washers in calculus?

One shortcut is to use the shell method when possible, as it typically requires less computation than the disk or washer method. Additionally, it is important to carefully choose the limits of integration and to accurately represent the cross-sections of the solid in order to get an accurate answer.

Back
Top