- #1
- 961
- 664
Let's say we have a proposition (or state, if we prefer) ##P\equiv \psi \equiv AB^\perp + e^{j \theta} A^\perp B## where, e.g., ##A^{\perp}## indicates some ket that is orthogonal to ##A##.
We also have an operator ##\hat{O}## .
Without reference to a physical context, is there a test to say whether there will be interference in the probability of observing a given eigenvalue of ##\hat{O}## as we vary the phase ##\theta## ? In other words, how would a shut-up-and-calculate robot know whether it should sum-then-square or it should square-then-sum?
We also have an operator ##\hat{O}## .
Without reference to a physical context, is there a test to say whether there will be interference in the probability of observing a given eigenvalue of ##\hat{O}## as we vary the phase ##\theta## ? In other words, how would a shut-up-and-calculate robot know whether it should sum-then-square or it should square-then-sum?