Divisibility Question: Proving 12|(n^2-1) for Odd n^2 and Non-Divisibility by 3

In summary, by showing that n^2 is odd and 3 does not divide n^2, it can be proven that 12 divides (n^2-1). This is because n^2-1 is divisible by both 3 and 4, and since 12 is the lowest common multiple of 3 and 4, it follows that 12 also divides n^2-1.
  • #1
kreil
Insights Author
Gold Member
668
68

Homework Statement


Suppose that [itex]n^2[/itex] is odd and that 3 does not divide [itex]n^2[/itex]. Show that [itex]12|(n^2-1)[/itex]


Homework Equations


none


The Attempt at a Solution


Well I know that since [itex]n^2[/itex] is odd, [itex]n^2-1[/itex] is even. I'm not sure what the next step would be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hmm i did some more thinking on this. Please let me know if you think this is correct:

- since [itex]n^2[/itex] is odd, [itex]n^2-1[/itex] is an even number and [itex]2|n^2-1[/itex]

- [itex]n^2[/itex] is not prime since it has at least 3 divisors: {1, n, [itex]n^2[/itex]}

- if 3 does not divide [itex]n^2[/itex], then the remainder of this division must be either 1 or 2 (a remainder of 3 implies that 3 does divide [itex]n^2[/itex]). However, the remainder cannot be 2 or else [itex]n^2[/itex] would be prime, therefore the remainder must be 1.

- this implies 3|[itex]n^2-1[/itex] evenly, since the -1 cancels with the remainder on division with [itex]n^2[/itex].

Since 2|[itex]n^2-1[/itex], 3|[itex]n^2-1[/itex] and [itex]12=2^2 3^1[/itex], it follows that 12|[itex]n^2-1[/itex].
 
  • #3
Hi kreil! :smile:
kreil said:
Suppose that [itex]n^2[/itex] is odd and that 3 does not divide [itex]n^2[/itex]. Show that [itex]12|(n^2-1)[/itex]

kreil said:
- if 3 does not divide [itex]n^2[/itex], then the remainder of this division must be either 1 or 2

forget n2 :rolleyes:

… what is the remainder if you divide n by 2 or 3? :wink:
 
  • #4
n is odd

so 2 divides into n with r=1

3 divides into n with r=2 since r=1 implies n is even and r=0 or 3 implies 3 divides [itex]n^2[/itex]soo does this mean that 3 divides into [itex]n^2[/itex] with remainder [itex]r^2[/itex] (i.e. r=1)?
 
  • #5
kreil said:
3 divides into n with r=2 since r=1 implies n is even

No it doesn't …

what about 7? :wink:
 
  • #6
oops, so 3|n with r=1 or r=2

what does this mean?
 
  • #7
kreil said:
oops, so 3|n with r=1 or r=2

that's better! :smile:

now you have the possible remainders for 2 and 3 …

so … ? :wink:
 
  • #8
so if 3|n with r=1 or r=2, then 3|[itex]n^2[/itex] with r=1 or r=4 and since if r=4 3|4 with r=1, 3|[itex]n^2[/itex] with r=1

is that correct logic?
 
  • #9
kreil said:
so if 3|n with r=1 or r=2, then 3|[itex]n^2[/itex] with r=1 or r=4 and since if r=4 3|4 with r=1, 3|[itex]n^2[/itex] with r=1

is that correct logic?

wot's incorrect logic? :confused:

anyway, how can 3 divide anything with r = 4??
 
  • #10
tiny-tim said:
wot's incorrect logic? :confused:

anyway, how can 3 divide anything with r = 4??

haha, this doesn't tell me very much about whether what i wrote was right or not...

is it true that if 3|n with remainder r, that 3|[itex]n^2[/itex] with remainder [itex]r^2[/itex]??
 
  • #11
i now know that this problem reduces to the problem of showing that 3|[itex]n^2[/itex] with r=1, i just don't understand how to connect division of n by 2 and 3 to this..
 
  • #12
Hint: 6

and I'm going to bed :zzz:​
 
  • #13
i don't understand how to make the next step to saying 6|n rem 1..

i think I'm missing something here
 
  • #14
for ex if n is 11,

2|11 rem 1

3|11 rem 2

6|11 rem 5...

BUT 6|121 rem 1
 
  • #15
i am so lost on this now...
 
  • #16
just got up :zzz: …

what are the possible remainders on dividing by 6? :smile:
 
  • #17
because of the condition 0<r<6 for the equation n = 6b + r for some b, r can be 1,2,3,4,5.
 
  • #18
kreil said:
because of the condition 0<r<6 for the equation n = 6b + r for some b, r can be 1,2,3,4,5.

uhh? :confused: but n2 is odd and 3 does not divide n2.
 
  • #19
tiny tim is pointing you at the Chinese remainder theorem.


But let's try a different way.

n is odd, so n=2m+1 for some m. Now what divides n^2-1?

n is not divisible by 3, so either n=3r+1 or 3r+2. In either case, what can you show divides n^2-1?

Equivalently, n^2-1 is congruent to what mod what and what? (insert useful things instead of 'what' in that sentence.)
 
  • #20
matt grime said:
tiny tim is pointing you at the Chinese remainder theorem.But let's try a different way.

n is odd, so n=2m+1 for some m. Now what divides n^2-1?

[itex]n^2=(2m+1)(2m+1)=4m^2+4m+1 \implies n^2-1=4(m^2+m)[/itex] for some m, and 4|[itex]n^2-1[/itex]

n is not divisible by 3, so either n=3r+1 or 3r+2. In either case, what can you show divides n^2-1?

[itex]n^2=9r^2+6r+1[/itex]

or [itex]n^2=9r^2+6r+4[/itex]

so [itex]n^2-1=9r^2+6r=3(3r^2+2r)[/itex]

or [itex]n^2-1=9r^2+6r+3=3(3r^2+2r+1)[/itex]

and in both cases 3|[itex]n^2-1[/itex]

Equivalently, n^2-1 is congruent to what mod what and what? (insert useful things instead of 'what' in that sentence.)

so [tex]n^2-1=(3r^2+2r)(mod 3) [/tex] and [tex]n^2-1=(3r^2+2r+1)(mod 3)[/tex]??
 
  • #21
You have correctly shown that 3 and 4 divide n^2 - 1. So what does that mean? I don't understand what you're attempting to say in your last line, not least because it says that 0=1.
 
  • #22
thanks!
 

FAQ: Divisibility Question: Proving 12|(n^2-1) for Odd n^2 and Non-Divisibility by 3

What does the divisibility question "12|(n^2-1) for Odd n^2 and Non-Divisibility by 3" mean?

This question is asking if the number 12 divides evenly into the expression (n^2-1) when n^2 is an odd number, and if the expression is not divisible by 3.

Why is it important to prove this divisibility question for odd n^2 and non-divisibility by 3?

This question is important because it helps us understand the properties of numbers and how they can be divided or multiplied. It also helps in solving more complex mathematical problems.

How can you prove that 12|(n^2-1) for odd n^2 and non-divisibility by 3?

To prove this divisibility question, we can use the method of mathematical induction. First, we can show that the statement is true for n=1. Then, we can assume it is true for any odd value of n, and use that to prove that it is also true for n+2. This will prove the statement for all odd values of n.

What happens if n^2 is an even number in the expression (n^2-1)?

If n^2 is an even number, then the expression (n^2-1) will be odd. This means that the statement will still hold true, as long as n is an odd number. This is because when n is odd, n^2 will always be odd and (n^2-1) will be even, making it divisible by 2. Therefore, the statement holds true for all odd n^2 values, whether it is divisible by 3 or not.

Why is the non-divisibility by 3 important in this divisibility question?

The non-divisibility by 3 is important because it ensures that the expression (n^2-1) is not divisible by 3, which could affect the overall divisibility by 12. This helps us narrow down the possible values of n and simplifies the proof process.

Similar threads

Back
Top