- #36
zonde
Gold Member
- 2,961
- 224
UnderstoodPaul Colby said:By Alice's measurement results I'm including all possible analyses not including knowledge of Bob's data or settings. This includes details of Alice's time history which QM says are statistically independent of one another.
Yes, given our current understanding of phenomena this is false claim. Bob's measurement choices by itself can't affect Alice's measurements (otherwise it would allow FTL communication). We have to include Bob's measurement event itself and it's outcome to to say that either Bob's measurement affects Alice's measurement or Alice's measurement affects Bob's measurement.Paul Colby said:When someone says Bob's measurement choices affect Alice's measurements they are making a false claim
This statement however is not true in general. If we formulate it like "Bob's measurements in no way change Alice's and vice versa" we even can claim that this statement is false.Paul Colby said:Bob's measurements in no way change Alice's.