Do clocks remain synchronized forever according to the equivalence principle?

  • Thread starter Bob Walance
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Clock
In summary: Bill's clock would gradually be ticking faster than Jim's because 1g is a much bigger acceleration than 0g. So, after the 5 year interval, Bill's clock would have aged 83.7 years while Jim's would only have aged 1.7 years.Thanks for any insight into this.
  • #1
Bob Walance
Insights Author
Gold Member
81
55
I did do some searching on this site for an answer to this, but couldn't find exactly what I was looking for. So, here it goes:

First -- assume that the gravitational field that Jim experiences is "homogenous" (that is, constant magnitude and direction within his region of spacetime).


Jim is standing on the Earth and is holding a clock. Bill, who has a similar clock, is in a rocket ship that is accelerating at a constant 1g (as measured by the body weight scale that Bill is standing on).

1 - Since, according to Einstein, these two cases are "equivalent", then shouldn't Jim's and Bill's clocks remain synchronized forever?

If this is true, then what this website says about relative aging is misleading.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.html

It seems, rather, that a clock in an inertial frame of reference, for example a clock on a satellite, would age differently than Jim's and Bill's clocks.

2 - In this case the satellite is in 0g and Bill and Jim are at 1g, then after 5 years have elapsed on Bill's and Jim's clocks the satellite's clock will have aged 83.7 years, correct?

Thanks for any insight into this.

Bob Walance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Bob Walance said:
1 - Since, according to Einstein, these two cases are "equivalent", then shouldn't Jim's and Bill's clocks remain synchronized forever?
The equivalence principle just says that if they each make local observations--observations in a very small patch of space around them, over a brief amount of time (technically the equivalence is only exact if the space and time are infinitesimally small)--then they will see the same results if they perform identical experiments. The equivalence principle does not imply that if they are observing each other over a large distance and a significant period of time, that they will each observe the other's clock to be ticking at the same rate...the rate each sees would depend on the geometry of the whole spacetime and their relative positions in it.
 
  • #3
JesseM said:
The equivalence principle just says that if they each make local observations--observations in a very small patch of space around them, over a brief amount of time (technically the equivalence is only exact if the space and time are infinitesimally small)--then they will see the same results if they perform identical experiments. The equivalence principle does not imply that if they are observing each other over a large distance and a significant period of time, that they will each observe the other's clock to be ticking at the same rate...the rate each sees would depend on the geometry of the whole spacetime and their relative positions in it.

So, if the space traveler returns to Earth, and assuming he orients his spacecraft to maintain his 1g acceleration the entire time, will the two clocks read the same?

Thanks,
Bob
 
  • #4
Bob Walance said:
I did do some searching on this site for an answer to this, but couldn't find exactly what I was looking for. So, here it goes:

First -- assume that the gravitational field that Jim experiences is "homogenous" (that is, constant magnitude and direction within his region of spacetime).


Jim is standing on the Earth and is holding a clock. Bill, who has a similar clock, is in a rocket ship that is accelerating at a constant 1g (as measured by the body weight scale that Bill is standing on).

1 - Since, according to Einstein, these two cases are "equivalent", then shouldn't Jim's and Bill's clocks remain synchronized forever?
Yes, if the relative velocity between them is zero. If not, then you have to account for SR time dilation.

And the equivalence principle says that Jim and Bill will get the same results for any local experiment they each perform. It doesn't say that each one's clock will read the same as the other. That would only be true if they were stationary with respect to each other, like if the rocket were 10 ft off the ground accelerating to oppose gravity, and Jim is 10 ft off the ground on a ledge next to the ship. Then their clocks would stay in synch with each other.
 
  • #5
Bob Walance said:
So, if the space traveler returns to Earth, and assuming he orients his spacecraft to maintain his 1g acceleration the entire time, will the two clocks read the same?
No, not necessarily. Again, the equivalence principle is only about experiments which take place entirely in one small piece of spacetime--an experiment that involves starting out with synchronized clocks, then moving apart some significant distance for a significant time, then coming together and comparing clocks again, is not an experiment confined to a tiny region of spacetime where the effects of spacetime curvature can be considered negligible.
 

FAQ: Do clocks remain synchronized forever according to the equivalence principle?

What is "Yet another clock question"?

"Yet another clock question" is a commonly used phrase that refers to a hypothetical scenario or problem that involves time and clocks. It is often used as a humorous or sarcastic way to describe a situation that is seemingly simple but can become complex when considering different factors related to clocks and time.

Why are there so many "Yet another clock question" puzzles?

Clocks have been used as a tool for measuring time for centuries, and as such, they have become a popular subject for puzzles and brain teasers. The complexity and precision involved in measuring time make clocks a fascinating topic to explore and experiment with, leading to many different "Yet another clock question" puzzles being created.

Are "Yet another clock question" puzzles only for mathematicians?

No, "Yet another clock question" puzzles are not exclusive to mathematicians. While some puzzles may involve mathematical concepts, many of them require logical thinking and problem-solving skills that anyone can develop. These puzzles can be enjoyed by people of all ages and backgrounds.

Can "Yet another clock question" puzzles have more than one solution?

Yes, some "Yet another clock question" puzzles can have multiple solutions. These puzzles often have different approaches or interpretations that can lead to different answers. It is essential to carefully consider the given information and think creatively to find all possible solutions.

How can "Yet another clock question" puzzles be beneficial?

Engaging with "Yet another clock question" puzzles can help improve critical thinking, problem-solving, and time management skills. These puzzles also promote creativity and logical reasoning, which can be useful in various fields, including science, mathematics, and engineering. Additionally, solving puzzles can be a fun and exciting way to challenge the mind and pass the time.

Back
Top