B Do eigenstate probabilities change with time?

sgphysics
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
To my understanding any quantum system can be describes as a linear combination of eigenstates or eigevectors of any hermetian operator, and that the eigen values represent the observable properties. But how does the system change with time? I suppose big systems with many particles change with time. Do the weights for the different eigenstates change with time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have time dependent Shrodinger equation to describe time evolution of the states. For an example in diffusion of Gaussian wave function in free space, weights of different position eigenstates change with time.
 
Last edited:
sgphysics said:
To my understanding any quantum system can be describes as a linear combination of eigenstates or eigevectors of any hermetian operator, and that the eigen values represent the observable properties. But how does the system change with time? I suppose big systems with many particles change with time. Do the weights for the different eigenstates change with time?
An energy eigenstate is also called a stationary state because the expectation value of all observables is independent of time. This is not the case for a superposition of energy eigenstates.

The expectation value of any observable whose operator commutes with the Hamiltonian does not change over time. For other observables the expectation value may be time dependent, as above.

E.g. if you have the quantum harmonic oscillator in a superposition of energy eigenstates, then the expectation values of position and momentum change harmonically over time.

PS this assumes a time independent Hamiltonian. If the Hamiltonian itself depends on time then in general so do all observables.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top