- #36
XZ923
- 136
- 64
russ_watters said:Delta Force? Fictional action movie star girl? Can't tell if serious, but sure hope not...
True, if someone's going to bring up Katniss Everdeen's bow, it belongs in Sci-Fi. Next thing you know we'll be discussing the accuracy of Han Solo's blaster. In all fairness though, the accuracy of Katniss's bow has nothing to do with the bow's physical composition. Nowhere in the movies does the bow accomplish a shot that Howard Hill probably couldn't replicate with a basic longbow while shooting The Adventures of Robin Hood (I think, I only saw them once). The weapon's accuracy has everything to do with the fact that it's wielded by the "hero" main character...
Back in the real world though, to the OP's original premise, I would point out that when talking about the use of arrows in warfare, it wouldn't have to be a straight-up kill shot. Arrow wounds would affect the fighting performance of the soldier, making them more likely to die in hand-to-hand combat. Also, medical science in that era was such that a flesh wound could easily cause a potentially lethal infection (especially in the chaos of a battlefield). So there were ways an arrow could kill other than "the string's released, the arrow flies, the other guy drops dead". That's in addition to all the other great points on here that a heavier-weight bow (around the 80 pound and up range) can easily put an arrow through someone's heart.
EDIT
OP, if you're interested in this type of thing (how weapons do their damage) check out the TV show Deadliest Warrior. It was one of my favorite shows when it was on. They use all kinds of instrumentation and test scenarios to study the actual damage weapons would inflict.
Last edited: