Do Integral Properties of Functions Imply Independence from Variables?

  • Thread starter Heirot
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, the sum/integral over all y's of f^n * g does not necessarily depend on x for every natural number n (and zero). This is because g(x,y) can be equal to 0 for all x and y, making the integral a constant regardless of the value of f(x,y). However, if we do not assume the trivial solutions of f(x,y)=0 or g(x,y)=0, then the statement may hold.
  • #1
Heirot
151
0
Hello,

let's say we have two functions of two variables: f(x,y) and g(x,y). Say we know that the sum / integral over all y's of f^n * g does not depend on x for every natural number n (and zero). Does that mean that f and g both don't depend on x?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Not necessarily. Let g(x,y)= 0 for all x and y. Then f^n*g (I assume you mean composition) is f^n(0) for all x and y so the sum/integral is a constant no matter what f is. If f^n*g is ordinary multiplication of functions, then f^n*g= 0 for all x and y and again, the integral is a constant no matter what f is.
 
  • #3
If it's composition, then g better be a vector
 
  • #4
Sorry for not being clear - f(x,y) and g(x,y) are scalar functions and * is ordinary multiplication. f^n is then f multiplied n times by itself. Now, if we don't assume the trivial null solution, f(x,y)=0 or g(x,y)=0, does my statement hold?
 

FAQ: Do Integral Properties of Functions Imply Independence from Variables?

Is there a scientific method for proving something?

Yes, the scientific method is a systematic approach used by scientists to test and validate hypotheses through observation, experimentation, and analysis of results.

Can scientific theories or laws be proven?

No, scientific theories and laws are not considered to be proven, but rather they are accepted as the most plausible and supported explanation for a natural phenomenon based on available evidence.

What is the difference between a proof and evidence in science?

A proof is a logical and mathematical demonstration that a statement or principle is true, while evidence is data or observations that support a hypothesis or theory.

How do scientists ensure the validity of their proofs?

Scientists use peer review, replication of experiments, and statistical analysis to ensure the validity and reliability of their proofs.

Is absolute certainty possible in science?

No, absolute certainty is not possible in science as new evidence and discoveries may challenge previously accepted theories and knowledge.

Back
Top