- #1
Joppy
MHB
- 284
- 22
I only have a basic understanding of this theorem at the moment, and may make another post regarding some of the details at another time. Currently I just want to check if I'm interpreting it correctly:
Loosely speaking, the theorem enables us to say that the Lyapunov exponents exist almost everywhere in the phase space under some measure theoretic/ergodic requirements (?).
I'm curious about what happens when we study the Lyapunov exponents on a subspace of our phase space. I guess a typical example would be studying the map induced by a flow for some system (perhaps through a Poincare section).
Now, suppose we can identify the Lyapunov exponents for the map readily, but not for the flow. Are the exponents on our map totally independent to those of the flow? I assume that they would almost never be equal, but perhaps related to each other in some way. Can we verify that exponential expansion or contraction on the map is also true for the flow? And does this have anything to do with Oseledet's...
Loosely speaking, the theorem enables us to say that the Lyapunov exponents exist almost everywhere in the phase space under some measure theoretic/ergodic requirements (?).
I'm curious about what happens when we study the Lyapunov exponents on a subspace of our phase space. I guess a typical example would be studying the map induced by a flow for some system (perhaps through a Poincare section).
Now, suppose we can identify the Lyapunov exponents for the map readily, but not for the flow. Are the exponents on our map totally independent to those of the flow? I assume that they would almost never be equal, but perhaps related to each other in some way. Can we verify that exponential expansion or contraction on the map is also true for the flow? And does this have anything to do with Oseledet's...