Do you find the current PF Newsletter uninformative?

  • Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the difference between the old and current PF newsletters, with one person mentioning that they do not find much value in the current ones. It is suggested to delegate the task of creating newsletters to different staff members based on their availability or have each staff member contribute a paragraph for each newsletter.
  • #1
Loren Booda
3,125
4
I glean very little that is "news" from the most recent PF computer-generated newsletters. The old ones were much more personal and original.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Agreed, but I no longer have the time to commit to the in-depth newsletters like I used to. The current newsletter is mainly for members who visit a few times a week or less. It gives them a brief overview of what is happening and what's new.
 
  • #3
suggestion: delegate

If another admin doesn't have time for it either, then perhaps we could have the PF staff take turns, based on their availability. Or, the PF staff could each contribute 1 paragraph that is compiled into each newsletter.
 

FAQ: Do you find the current PF Newsletter uninformative?

1. Why do you find the current PF Newsletter uninformative?

As a scientist, I value accuracy, evidence, and new information. The current PF Newsletter lacks these elements, making it uninformative for me.

2. What specific areas or topics would you like to see more coverage on in the PF Newsletter?

I would like to see more coverage on new research findings, data analysis, and expert opinions on personal finance topics. These would provide valuable insights and help me make informed decisions.

3. How does the lack of informative content in the PF Newsletter affect your work as a scientist?

As a scientist, staying updated on the latest research and findings is crucial for my work. The uninformative content in the PF Newsletter does not contribute to my knowledge and understanding of personal finance, which could potentially hinder my research in this field.

4. Do you think the PF Newsletter could benefit from including more scientific data and evidence-based information?

Yes, I believe that incorporating more scientific data and evidence-based information would greatly improve the quality and usefulness of the PF Newsletter. This would also attract a wider audience, including scientists and researchers interested in personal finance.

5. How can the PF Newsletter be improved to better cater to the needs of scientists and other professionals?

The PF Newsletter can be improved by including more reliable and accurate information, featuring research-based articles, and collaborating with experts in the field of personal finance. It could also benefit from incorporating interactive elements, such as surveys and quizzes, to engage readers and gather feedback.

Similar threads

Other Article 26 Backpack News & Resources: Spring 2022 Newsletter
Replies
5
Views
1K
Requesting PF Newsletter - Help Appreciated!
Replies
1
Views
3K
Suggestion Ambiguous wording of "You have insufficient privileges to reply here"
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Poll
Suggestion In search of the faces behind the usernames
Replies
17
Views
2K
Praise My feedback, one month and half experience in PF so far
Replies
1
Views
2K
When Mozilla Thunderbird message filters quit....
Replies
24
Views
4K
Suggestion Threads asking for ideas to work on
Replies
7
Views
1K
Suggestion How Could a Dedicated Physics Wiki Enhance Learning and Problem Solving?
Replies
12
Views
2K
What if we had commercial fusion power?
3
Replies
70
Views
9K
Suggestion All Caps in Posts; Imperatives
Replies
22
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top