- #1
user079622
- 329
- 22
Does wing really fly in already downward moving air?
Video from 18:15 - 19:40
Video from 18:15 - 19:40
If wing fly in own downwash, that would mean air ahead of the wing already moving downward.boneh3ad said:I don't understand the question.
Because I see upward movement of air ahead of wing...not downward..boneh3ad said:So, sure, some of that induced flow over a finite wing is downward, reducing lift.
Why are you asking me, though?
That's an airfoil, not a wing. It's 2-dimensional. The downwash is a 3-D wing effect that doesn't occur in this 2-D case.user079622 said:Because I see upward movement of air ahead of wing...not downward..
View attachment 337150
OK just reduce this upwash a little but and you get picture for wing.russ_watters said:That's an airfoil, not a wing. It's 2-dimensional. The downwash is a 3-D wing effect that doesn't occur in this 2-D case.
russ_watters said:That's an airfoil, not a wing. It's 2-dimensional. The downwash is a 3-D wing effect that doesn't occur in this 2-D case.
The image in your OP shows wingtip vortices. Is that what you are asking about? In 2-D you don't have any beginning or end of your wing.user079622 said:OK just reduce this upwash a little but and you get picture for wing.
Or you want to say that air moves downward ahead of wing ?
The flow isn't uniform across the span, so I'd say there's no general answer for the question. I suspect there is upwards flow in front of parts of the wing and downwards flow in front of other parts. But I don't think I've seen a 3D representation of the flow field.user079622 said:OK just reduce this upwash a little but and you get picture for wing.
Or you want to say that air moves downward ahead of wing ?
This is upwash ahead of wing for different aspect ratios.FactChecker said:The net downward flow of the air is the cause of lift. But that is primarily aft of the wing. The wing is the cause of the downflow and does not have the same effect of a wing in a downflow from following another airplane. So not all downflows are the same.
russ_watters said:That's an airfoil, not a wing.
Downwash refers to the downward deflection of the airflow as it passes over and beyond a wing. This phenomenon occurs because the wing generates lift by accelerating air downward, which results in a reaction force that lifts the wing upward.
No, a wing does not fly in its own downwash. The downwash created by a wing affects the airflow behind and below the wing, but the wing itself is primarily influenced by the airflow approaching it from the front. The wing generates lift by manipulating this incoming airflow.
Downwash affects the performance of an aircraft by influencing the effective angle of attack experienced by the horizontal tail surfaces and other components. It can also contribute to induced drag, which is a byproduct of lift generation. Pilots and engineers must account for these effects when designing and flying aircraft.
Yes, downwash can be beneficial in certain contexts. For example, in formation flying, trailing aircraft can take advantage of the altered airflow patterns created by the lead aircraft's downwash to reduce their own induced drag, thereby improving fuel efficiency.
Engineers mitigate the negative effects of downwash through various design strategies, such as optimizing wing shapes, using winglets to reduce induced drag, and carefully designing the aircraft's tail surfaces to handle the altered airflow. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and wind tunnel testing are often employed to refine these designs.