Why Is the Integral Result 175/3 Instead of 45?

  • I
  • Thread starter homeworkhelpls
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Area Curve
In summary, the speaker integrated y using the upper limit of 5 and lower limit of 2 in order to get the result of 45/3, but the correct answer should have been 175/3. This discrepancy may be due to a typo or calculation error by the person who set the question. Additionally, using the notation (1/3)x^3 instead of 1/3x^3 can help avoid confusion.
  • #1
homeworkhelpls
41
1
1675365471735.png

i integrated y to get (1/3x^3 + 2x) with upper limit 5 / lower limit 2 but got 45 not 175 / 3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
homeworkhelpls said:
View attachment 321610
i integrated y to get (1/3x^3 + 2x) with upper limit 5 / lower limit 2 but got 45 not 175 / 3
Both Wolfram Alpha and I agree with you.
 
  • Like
Likes homeworkhelpls and topsquark
  • #3
Me too!
 
  • Like
Likes homeworkhelpls
  • #4
The integral would evaluate to 175/3 if the lower limit were x=-2. I suspect a silly typo or calculation slip by the question setter.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes homeworkhelpls and PeroK
  • #5
homeworkhelpls said:
View attachment 321610
i integrated y to get (1/3x^3 + 2x) with upper limit 5 / lower limit 2 but got 45 not 175 / 3
Just a notation tip. 1/3x^3 can be misread as 1/(3x^3) placing the x^3 in the denominator. To be precise, we can instead write (1/3)x^3 to ensure x^3 is in the numerator and not mistakenly placed in the denominator.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • General Math
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
14
Views
668
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
706
Replies
1
Views
872
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top