Does Bezout's theorem work both ways?

In summary, Bezout's theorem states that for two algebraic curves defined by polynomials, the number of intersection points, counted with multiplicity, equals the product of their degrees. The theorem is primarily applicable in one direction, where it predicts the intersections based on the degrees of the curves. However, it does not necessarily imply that every set of intersection points corresponds to a unique pair of curves with those degrees, indicating that the theorem does not work both ways.
  • #1
Heisenberg7
101
18
Homework Statement
Below
Relevant Equations
Below
Let's assume that for integers ##m## and ##n## (and integers ##x_1## and ##y_1##) the following is satisfied: $$mx_1 + ny_1 = 1$$ Then by this theorem (for some integer ##k##), if ##k|a## and ##k|b## then ##k|mx+ny## for all integers ##x## and ##y##. So it must be, $$k | mx_1 + ny_1$$ for all common factors of ##m## and ##n##. In other words, $$k|1$$ for all common factors of ##m## and ##n##. But this implies that ##k=1## since ##k## is an integer. Thus ##(m, n) = 1##. Since I've never seen this be mentioned before, I'll be happy to see where I went wrong.

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Made a little correction. Numbers ##x_1## and ##y_1## are integers as well.
 
  • #3
By Bezout's theorem, if ##(m,n)=1## there exists ##x## and ##y## such that

\begin{align*}
mx+ny=1 .
\end{align*}

Are you asking if we can find integers ##x_1## and ##y_1## such that

\begin{align*}
mx_1+ny_1=1
\end{align*}

then is ##(m,n)=1##? In that case, ##(m,n) | mx_1+ny_1 \Rightarrow (m,n) | 1 \Rightarrow (m,n)=1##.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
julian said:
By Bezout's theorem, if ##(m,n)=1## there exists ##x## and ##y## such that

\begin{align*}
mx+ny=1 .
\end{align*}

Are you asking if we can find integers ##x_1## and ##y_1## such that

\begin{align*}
mx_1+ny_1=1
\end{align*}

then is ##(m,n)=1##? In that case, ##(m,n) | mx_1+ny_1 \Rightarrow (m,n) | 1 \Rightarrow (m,n)=1##.
Yes. That's what I'm asking for. Seems like a useful property for problem solving. So, I am right?
 
  • #5
It is correct. It follows trivially. As ##(m,n)## divides ##m## and ##n## by definition, and given that we have found ##x_1## and ##x_2## such that ##mx_1+ny_1=1##, we have ##(m,n) | 1##. It may be useful in proving two integers are coprime.
 
  • Like
Likes Heisenberg7
  • #6
Also, in general ##(m,n)=d## implies ##xm+yn=d## for some integers ##x,y##. The converse is not true, though.
 
  • #7
nuuskur said:
Also, in general ##(m,n)=d## implies ##xm+yn=d## for some integers ##x,y##. The converse is not true, though.
Well, in case of a prime number ##k## for which ##xm + yn = k## for some integers ##x,y,m,n##, shouldn't it be true? I mean, ##(m,n)|xm+yn \implies (m,n)|k \implies (m,n) = 1 \vee (m,n) = k##. So we only need to verify whether ##(m,n)## equals 1 or ##k##.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top