Does Cyclical Universe Theory Account for Matter Distribution Anomalies?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of a cyclical universe and whether current models account for any remaining material outside the "Big Crunch" event. The possibility of a previous "Big Crunch" not fully collapsing and causing a "bounce" is also mentioned.
  • #1
Newton2041
1
0
Who first proposed a cyclical universe -- Big Bang / Big Crunch / Big Bang / etc. ?

Do any current models account for remnant material outside the Big Crunch as a possible explanation for the non-uniform distribution of matter following the Big Bang?

In other words, is it possible that a previous Big Crunch didn't crunch everything in that universe?

Thank you for commenting.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
While I don't know if he was the first, I did read that Einstein flirted with the idea of an oscillating universe in the 1930's. As for the second part of your question, if I understand you correctly, it is possible that a previous "big crunch" didn't crunch everything. In such a case the gravitational force crushes everything together, but before reaching a singularity vacuum energy causes a "pressure" so great that it prevents total collapse and the universe "bounces".
 

FAQ: Does Cyclical Universe Theory Account for Matter Distribution Anomalies?

What is the Theory of Cyclical Universe?

The Theory of Cyclical Universe is a scientific hypothesis that suggests the universe goes through endless cycles of expansion and contraction. This theory challenges the traditional notion of a single Big Bang event and proposes that the universe has been in existence for an infinite amount of time.

How does the Theory of Cyclical Universe explain the formation of the universe?

According to this theory, the universe expands and contracts in a never-ending cycle. During the expansion phase, galaxies and other celestial bodies are formed as a result of the expansion and cooling of matter. When the universe reaches its maximum expansion, it begins to contract, and all matter is pulled back together, eventually leading to another Big Bang event.

What evidence supports the Theory of Cyclical Universe?

One of the main pieces of evidence for this theory is the observation of cosmic microwave background radiation, which is believed to be remnants of the previous universe's contraction phase. Additionally, studies of the cosmic microwave background have shown that the universe appears to be flat, which aligns with the cyclical model's predictions.

How does the Theory of Cyclical Universe differ from the Big Bang theory?

The Big Bang theory proposes that the universe began with a single explosive event, while the Theory of Cyclical Universe suggests that the universe has always existed and goes through cycles of expansion and contraction. Additionally, the cyclical model does not require the existence of a singularity, which is a point of infinite density and temperature at the beginning of the universe.

Is the Theory of Cyclical Universe widely accepted by the scientific community?

The Theory of Cyclical Universe is a relatively new concept and is still being studied and debated by scientists. While some researchers support this theory, others argue that there is not enough evidence to support it. Therefore, it is not widely accepted by the scientific community at this time, but further research and evidence may change this in the future.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Back
Top