Does light make us heavier and does the Earth's rotation affect our weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Discor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
Light does exert pressure on objects, but it primarily affects the surface atoms of skin and clothes, not penetrating deeply enough to significantly alter weight. While light pressure could theoretically be measured with sensitive instruments, its effects are minimal and not easily detectable. The pressure from sunlight would only impact surfaces directly facing it, correlating more with surface area than with mass. Additionally, if the sun were turned on suddenly, it would create a pressure wave that travels through the Earth at the speed of sound. Overall, while light does push on us, its effect on weight is negligible and complex.
Discor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello I am new to physics and I did no knew were else I can ask this question so i am sorry if I am in the wrong place.
My question is : if light makes us heavier by pushing our atoms does it means we are heavier in the day time? and the answer should be yes but then I thought if light pushes me, then it also pushes the Earth, which means that the Earth is pushing me when I am in the opposite site of the sunlight (the other part of the sphere) meaning that I am always weight the same. but should not the of the sunlight travel trough the Earth with the speed of sound?
My English is bad and I am very sorry for it.
But I am weary confused and i hope you can help me.
I Sincerely thank you!
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you had a very sensitive scale then it could indeed measure the radiation pressure from sunlight.
 
if light makes us heavier by pushing our atoms does it means we are heavier in the day time?

Light does push on us. But not on all our atoms. Just on the ones in our skin and clothes. It does not penetrate very far. It does not push very hard. Not enough to be easily detectable. You have to use fairly sensitive instruments in laboratory conditions to detect light pressure.

But pretend for the moment that light pressure was large enough to measure easily...

Because the light does not penetrate very far, that means that it would still only directly affect surfaces facing the sun. Light pressure would correlate well with surface area. It would not correlate well with volume or with mass.

Suppose that you had two bodies. One had a high surface area to mass ratio and one had a low surface area to mass ratio. Which would be accelerated more strongly by light pressure?

but should not the of the sunlight travel trough the Earth with the speed of sound?

If you turned on the sun (like turning on a light switch) then, theoretically, this would create a pressure wave. Yes, this pressure wave would move through the Earth at the speed of sound.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Light does push on us. But not on all our atoms. Just on the ones in our skin and clothes. It does not penetrate very far. It does not push very hard. Not enough to be easily detectable. You have to use fairly sensitive instruments in laboratory conditions to detect light pressure.

But pretend for the moment that light pressure was large enough to measure easily...

Because the light does not penetrate very far, that means that it would still only directly affect surfaces facing the sun. Light pressure would correlate well with surface area. It would not correlate well with volume or with mass.

Suppose that you had two bodies. One had a high surface area to mass ratio and one had a low surface area to mass ratio. Which would be accelerated more strongly by light pressure?



If you turned on the sun (like turning on a light switch) then, theoretically, this would create a pressure wave. Yes, this pressure wave would move through the Earth at the speed of sound.

Thank you!
I am less confused now
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...

Similar threads

Back
Top