Does Mapping with Bounded Distortion Preserve Zero Volume in Higher Dimensions?

In summary: But to answer your question, a step function is when I take a function like ##h:A\rightarrow E^m## and I make it so that for any point in ##A, h(x)=-x^2##.
  • #1
alex.
6
0

Homework Statement



Let ##A\subset E^n## and let ##f:A\to E^m.## Consider the condition that there exist some ##M\in\mathbb{R}## such that ##d(f(x),f(y))\le Md(x,y)## for all ##x,y\in A.##

Show that if the condition is satisfied, if ##m=n##, and ##\text{vol}(A)=0##, then ##\text{vol}((f(A))=0.## Now suppose ##m>n## and ##A## is bounded then show that ##\text{vol}(f(A))=0.##


Homework Equations



For an arbitrary subset ##A\subset E^n,## we say that ##A## has volume, and define the volume of ##A## to be ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_A 1,## if this integral exists.

The Attempt at a Solution




I am not sure how to do the second part of the question and I am not sure that my outline for the first part of the proof is correct.

For the first part, since the subset ##A## has volume zero then given any ##\epsilon>0## there exists a finite number of closed intervals in ##E^n## whose union contains ##A## and the sum of whose volumes is less that ##\epsilon.## So if a define ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_I f## for ##A\subset I## then for any ##\epsilon>0## there is a partition of ##I## such that any Riemann sum for ##f## corresponding to this partition has absolute value less that ##\epsilon.## So for ##x,y\in I,## let ##\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{M}## then ##|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon.## Then I can create step functions such that ##f## is sandwiched between the two step functions and since ##\text{vol}(A)=0## and ##m=n## then ##\text{vol}(f(A))=0.##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
alex. said:

Homework Statement



Let ##A\subset E^n## and let ##f:A\to E^m.## Consider the condition that there exist some ##M\in\mathbb{R}## such that ##d(f(x),f(y))\le Md(x,y)## for all ##x,y\in A.##

Show that if the condition is satisfied, if ##m=n##, and ##\text{vol}(A)=0##, then ##\text{vol}((f(A))=0.## Now suppose ##m>n## and ##A## is bounded then show that ##\text{vol}(f(A))=0.##


Homework Equations



For an arbitrary subset ##A\subset E^n,## we say that ##A## has volume, and define the volume of ##A## to be ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_A 1,## if this integral exists.

Some questions regarding the problem statement:

1) Is ##E## supposed to be some subset of ##\mathbb{R}##?

2) Is the integral that you're using to define volume the Riemann integral on ##\mathbb{R}^n##?

The Attempt at a Solution




I am not sure how to do the second part of the question and I am not sure that my outline for the first part of the proof is correct.

And some remarks on what you have done and questions for you to consider.

For the first part, since the subset ##A## has volume zero then given any ##\epsilon>0## there exists a finite number of closed intervals in ##E^n## whose union contains ##A## and the sum of whose volumes is less that ##\epsilon.##

What is a closed interval in ##E^n##? Are you sure this statement is even true in the case where ##E=\mathbb{R}## and ##n=1## (i.e. the simplest case)?

So if a define ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_I f## for ##A\subset I## then for any ##\epsilon>0## there is a partition of ##I## such that any Riemann sum for ##f## corresponding to this partition has absolute value less that ##\epsilon.##

##\text{vol}(A)## is already defined per your relevant equations as ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_A 1##. Furthermore, considering that ##f## is a map with codomain, ##E^m##, what does ##\int_I f## even mean? What does a Riemann sum for ##f## look like?

So for ##x,y\in I,## let ##\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{M}## then ##|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon.## Then I can create step functions such that ##f## is sandwiched between the two step functions and since ##\text{vol}(A)=0## and ##m=n## then ##\text{vol}(f(A))=0.##

What does a step function ##h:A\rightarrow E^m## look like?
 
  • #3
gopher_p said:
Some questions regarding the problem statement:

1) Is ##E## supposed to be some subset of ##\mathbb{R}##?

2) Is the integral that you're using to define volume the Riemann integral on ##\mathbb{R}^n##?

1) Yes, it is a subset of ##\mathbb{R}.##

2) That's correct

What is a closed interval in ##E^n##? Are you sure this statement is even true in the case where ##E=\mathbb{R}## and ##n=1## (i.e. the simplest case)?

Hmm, maybe I am not sure what you mean? The phrase I used was the definition the book gave me for volume zero.

##\text{vol}(A)## is already defined per your relevant equations as ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_A 1##. Furthermore, considering that ##f## is a map with codomain, ##E^m##, what does ##\int_I f## even mean? What does a Riemann sum for ##f## look like?

Hmm, I should start by saying what exactly is ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_A 1,## the book didn't clarify? But to answer your question, I defined ##\int_I f## to be the function ##f:I\to\mathbb{R}## by setting ##f(x)=1## if ##x\in A, \ f(x)=0## if ##x\in I-A,## so that ##\text{vol}(A)=\int_I f##.

What does a step function ##h:A\rightarrow E^m## look like?

Well, I was going to define my step functions later since I didn't know if my outline was correct or not
 

FAQ: Does Mapping with Bounded Distortion Preserve Zero Volume in Higher Dimensions?

What does it mean for a volume to be zero?

In mathematics, the volume of an object refers to the amount of space it occupies. A volume of zero means that the object has no measurable size or occupies no space at all.

Can an object have a volume of zero in real life?

In real life, an object with a volume of zero is considered to be a mathematical abstraction and does not exist in physical reality. However, some objects, such as a perfectly flat sheet of paper, can come very close to having a volume of zero.

How is the volume of zero calculated in real analysis?

In real analysis, the volume of zero is typically calculated using integrals. This involves breaking down the object into infinitesimally small pieces and summing them together to find the total volume. However, since an object with zero volume has no measurable size, the integral will also be zero.

What is the significance of studying the volume of zero in real analysis?

Studying the concept of volume of zero in real analysis allows us to better understand the properties of objects that have no measurable size. It also helps us to understand the concept of limits and how they apply to objects with infinitesimal volumes.

Can an object have a volume of zero and still have mass?

Yes, an object can have a volume of zero and still have mass. This is because volume and mass are two different properties of an object. An object with zero volume can still have mass if it has non-zero density, meaning the mass is concentrated in a very small area.

Back
Top