Does mass depend on energy scale?

In summary, the MS-bar scheme uses a running mass that changes with scale, but the physical mass remains constant. The physical mass is considered a coupling constant and must be defined at a certain scale. Renormalization involves rescaling and can be seen as a way of rewriting a Hamiltonian with different coupling constants. This concept is also seen in condensed matter physics. Renormalization is a complex topic and can be interpreted in different ways, such as considering the experimentally measured mass as the renormalized mass. Deep inelastic scattering is one type of experiment used to study the distinction between "bare" and "renormalized" masses.
  • #1
geoduck
258
2
In MS-bar scheme, the mass m is not the physical mass but runs with scale.

The physical mass should however be constant.

In that sense it seems you can't just regard mass as another coupling constant.

Physical coupling constants must be defined at some scale, while the physical mass is the physical mass at any scale.

What does it mean when m runs with scale? It doesn't mean the particle is getting heavier because the physical mass is always constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not entirely sure of what the MS-bar scheme is, but it may help you to do some research on "mass renormalization."

Though you don't see it explained in many quantum field theory books, you will find in many condensed matter textbooks (such as Cardy's "Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics" and in Chaikin and Lubensky's "Principles of Condensed Matter Physics") an explanation of how renormalization has everything to do with rescaling. Basically when you rewrite a Hamiltonian in some new system of units, you can make the change by keeping the Hamiltonian the same, but just changing the coupling constants--and if you rescale repeatedly by the right factors, you can massage your Hamiltonian into much prettier forms with "renormalized" constants. [Technically the process involves some more nontrivial steps than just changing units: for a lattice theory you might pick a block of pairwise interacting lattice sites and represent everything in each block by an equivalent single lattice site, etc.]

Whenever you renormalize, there's some rescaling going on behind the scenes, and in QFT, when you see any sort of renormalization, it can be interpreted in the context of rescaling, just as in condensed matter physics. (The details of this I'm not entirely sure of, but you could always look into the work done by Ken Wilson--he's the one who established all of this.) So basically when you see a "bare mass" (what you call the physical mass) and a "renormalized mass" (the coupling constant that's actually in your Hamiltonian), this is due to mass renormalization, and renormalization of any type has to do with scaling. (You can see the connection most easily in condensed matter/lattice theories but the same connection holds in field theories.)

But beware: this is very subtle stuff that took a while for people to figure out. In addition, there are some other perspectives you can take on this (for example, it's also legitimate to consider the coupling constant in the Hamiltonian to be the physical mass, and the experimentally measured mass to be the renormalized mass.) So be careful with this stuff: it can be confusing even for an expert.

One other way to interpret a "bare" vs. a "renormalized" quantity is in terms of screening, but this doesn't touch on the rescaling aspect of renormalization.

One kind of experiment that a lot of physicists studied to sort out the "bare" and "renormalized" masses is called "deep inelastic scattering", which probes the distinction between these two quantities.
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Does mass depend on energy scale?

Does mass change with energy scale?

Yes, mass can change with energy scale. According to Einstein's famous equation E=mc², mass and energy are two forms of the same thing and can be converted into each other. As energy increases, the mass also increases.

Is there a relationship between mass and energy?

Yes, there is a strong relationship between mass and energy. As mentioned before, they are two forms of the same thing and can be converted into each other. The amount of energy contained in an object is directly proportional to its mass.

How does the concept of mass-energy equivalence affect our understanding of the universe?

The concept of mass-energy equivalence has greatly impacted our understanding of the universe. It has helped us understand the connection between matter and energy and has led to the development of technologies such as nuclear power. It also plays a crucial role in understanding the behavior of particles at high energies, as observed in particle accelerators.

Can energy be converted into mass and vice versa?

Yes, energy can be converted into mass and vice versa. This phenomenon has been demonstrated in nuclear reactions where a small amount of mass is converted into a large amount of energy, and in particle accelerators where high-energy collisions can produce new particles with mass.

What is the significance of the famous equation E=mc²?

The equation E=mc² is significant because it shows the relationship between mass and energy, and how they are interchangeable. It has also revolutionized our understanding of the universe and has led to groundbreaking discoveries in the field of physics. It is also used in various practical applications, such as in nuclear power plants and medical imaging techniques.

Back
Top