Does Science Have a Universal Definition of Life?

In summary, the conversation discusses the definition of life in the scientific community and whether or not there is a universally accepted definition. While the article claims that science does not have a definition for life, the participants argue that there are various definitions, with one being that life is anything that consumes fuel, expends energy, reacts to external stimulus, and reproduces with heredity. However, this definition is challenged by the example of a mule, which cannot reproduce by heredity but is still considered a living being. Another possible definition suggested is that living systems are capable of metabolism and replication, although not every individual may possess these abilities. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexity and ongoing debate surrounding the definition of life in the scientific world.
  • #1
Routaran
447
94
Hello all
I was reading an article which claimed science did not have a definition for Life. that statement on face value i think is just plain wrong. I think the author may have ment that it didnt have a definition that everyone will perhaps agree on.

I am a computer programmer and my crude defintion is as follows:
Life is anything that consumes fuel and expends energy to maintain its "bodily functions", reacts to external stimulus and reproduces with heredity.


So i wanted to know if there was a definition that was accepted in the professional circles and what it was?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Routaran said:
Hello all
I was reading an article which claimed science did not have a definition for Life. that statement on face value i think is just plain wrong. I think the author may have ment that it didnt have a definition that everyone will perhaps agree on ...

Life is anything that consumes fuel and expends energy to maintain its "bodily functions", reacts to external stimulus and reproduces with heredity.

A mule can't reproduce by heredity, yet it is still life.
 
  • #3
crap, good point.
any other definitions that can't be shot down in one short sentence?
 
  • #4
In general, living systems are defined as being capable of metabolism (by which they maintain a lower state of entropy than the environment) and the ability to replicate. Not every individual may be able to replicate, but is at least created by replication. In maintaining a state far from equilibrium with the environment, living systems increase the overall environmental entropy.
 
Last edited:
  • #5


Hello there,

I can assure you that there is indeed a scientific definition of life that is widely accepted in professional circles. While there may be different interpretations and nuances to this definition, the core principles remain the same.

According to the scientific community, life can be defined as a self-sustaining, self-replicating system that is capable of evolving and adapting to its environment. This definition encompasses the key characteristics you mentioned, such as the ability to consume energy, respond to stimuli, and reproduce with heredity.

This definition of life is not limited to just biological organisms, but also includes artificial life forms and potential life on other planets. It is constantly evolving as our understanding of the universe expands.

I hope this clarifies any confusion and reaffirms that there is indeed a scientific definition of life. Thank you for your question and interest in this topic.
 

FAQ: Does Science Have a Universal Definition of Life?

What is the scientific definition of life?

The scientific definition of life is the condition that distinguishes organisms from non-living objects, including the capacity for growth, reproduction, functional activity, and the continual adaptation to the environment.

What are the characteristics of living things?

The characteristics of living things include the ability to maintain homeostasis, respond to stimuli, grow and develop, reproduce, and adapt to the environment.

How do scientists determine if something is living or non-living?

Scientists use the characteristics of living things to determine if something is living or non-living. If an object has the ability to carry out these characteristics, it is considered living.

Can viruses be considered living things?

There is ongoing debate among scientists about whether viruses should be considered living things. While they have some characteristics of living things, such as the ability to reproduce, they lack the ability to carry out other essential functions on their own.

What is the role of DNA in living organisms?

DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is the genetic material that carries the instructions for the development, functioning, and reproduction of all living organisms. It contains the code for all of the characteristics and traits of an organism.

Back
Top