- #1
Routaran
- 447
- 94
Hello all
I was reading an article which claimed science did not have a definition for Life. that statement on face value i think is just plain wrong. I think the author may have ment that it didnt have a definition that everyone will perhaps agree on.
I am a computer programmer and my crude defintion is as follows:
Life is anything that consumes fuel and expends energy to maintain its "bodily functions", reacts to external stimulus and reproduces with heredity.
So i wanted to know if there was a definition that was accepted in the professional circles and what it was?
I was reading an article which claimed science did not have a definition for Life. that statement on face value i think is just plain wrong. I think the author may have ment that it didnt have a definition that everyone will perhaps agree on.
I am a computer programmer and my crude defintion is as follows:
Life is anything that consumes fuel and expends energy to maintain its "bodily functions", reacts to external stimulus and reproduces with heredity.
So i wanted to know if there was a definition that was accepted in the professional circles and what it was?