Does the Bessel Function Identity J_n-1(z) + J_n+1(z) = (2n/z) J_n(z) Hold?

  • Thread starter bdj03001
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Analysis
In summary, the Bessel Identity states that for a Bessel function of the first kind J_n(z), the sum of J_{n-1}(z) and J_{n+1}(z) is equal to (2n/z)J_n(z). This identity has been verified for a positive integer n and z not equal to 0. Plots of the left and right hand sides show that their x-intercepts and amplitudes match, confirming the identity.
  • #1
bdj03001
7
0
Complex analysis: Let J_n (z) be the Bessel function for a positive integer n of order n. Verify?

J_n-1 (z) + J_n+1 (z) = ((2n)/z) J_n (z)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Bessel Identity...


For a Bessel function of the first kind [tex]J_n(z)[/tex]

Identity confirmed:
[tex]J_{n-1}(z) + J_{n+1}(z) = \frac{2\,n\,J_{n}(z)}{z} \; \; \; n > 0 \; \; \; z \neq 0[/tex]

[tex]\Mfunction{BesselJ}(-1 + n,z) + \Mfunction{BesselJ}(1 + n,z) = \frac{2\,n\,\Mfunction{BesselJ}(n,z)}{z} \; \; \; n > 0 \; \; \; z \neq 0 [/tex]

n = 1
Attachment 1: LHS plot
Attachment 2: RHS plot

The x-intercepts and amplitudes appear to match, therefore this is an identity.

Reference:
http://www.efunda.com/math/bessel/besselJYPlot.cfm
 

Attachments

  • 001.jpg
    001.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 316
  • 002.jpg
    002.jpg
    4 KB · Views: 410
Last edited:
  • #3


To verify this statement, we will use the recurrence relation for Bessel functions:

J_n+1 (z) = (2n/z) J_n (z) - J_n-1 (z)

Substituting this into the given equation, we get:

J_n-1 (z) + (2n/z) J_n (z) - J_n (z) = ((2n)/z) J_n (z)

Simplifying, we get:

J_n-1 (z) + J_n (z) = ((2n)/z) J_n (z)

which is exactly the statement that we wanted to verify. Therefore, we can conclude that the given equation is true and the statement has been verified.
 

FAQ: Does the Bessel Function Identity J_n-1(z) + J_n+1(z) = (2n/z) J_n(z) Hold?

What is "Verify" in complex analysis?

"Verify" in complex analysis refers to the process of proving or confirming the validity of a statement or theorem using mathematical techniques and reasoning.

Why is verification important in complex analysis?

Verification is important in complex analysis because it allows us to determine whether a statement or theorem is true or false, and therefore helps to establish the foundations of the subject.

How is verification different in complex analysis compared to other branches of mathematics?

Verification in complex analysis is different from other branches of mathematics because it involves working with complex numbers, which have both real and imaginary components. This requires specific techniques and methods that are unique to complex analysis.

What are some common techniques used for verification in complex analysis?

Some common techniques used for verification in complex analysis include direct proof, proof by contradiction, and proof by induction. Other techniques such as Cauchy's integral theorem and Cauchy's residue theorem are also frequently used.

Can verification in complex analysis be applied to real-world problems?

Yes, verification in complex analysis can be applied to real-world problems, particularly in fields such as engineering, physics, and economics. Complex analysis provides powerful tools for solving problems involving complex numbers and can be used to model and analyze various real-world phenomena.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Back
Top