Does the Compact Set K+K Have Nonempty Interior?

In summary, the Lebesque measure of a compact set is greater than the measure of its interior. Convolution of the characteristic function of a compact set with itself is a nonnegative continuous function that is positive on an open interval - this is enough to show that the set U=\{x\in\mathbb{R}\,:\,f(x)>0\} is nonempty.
  • #1
Nedeljko
40
0
Let [tex]K\subseteq\mathbb R[/tex] is a compact set of positive Lebesque measure. Prove that the set [tex]K+K=\{a+b\,|\,a,b\in K\}[/tex] has nonempty interior.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What have you tried so far? Do you know of any links between the Lebesgue measure and the topology of R?
 
  • #3
All open and all closed sets are measurable. For any measurable set [tex]E[/tex] and positive real [tex]\varepsilon[/tex] there are an closed set [tex]F\subseteq E[/tex] and an open set [tex]G\supseteq E[/tex] such that measure of [tex]G\setminus F[/tex] is less than [tex]\varepsilon[/tex].
 
  • #4
The original problem is formulated for any measurable set [tex]E[/tex]. Using the fact that any measurable set of positive measure has a compact subset of positive measure, the general case is reduced to special case of compact sets.
 
  • #5
I thought I had an elementary solution, but I discovered some holes in my reasoning. Anyway, a quick and dirty way to solve the problem is to convolve the characteristic function of K with itself. You will get a nonnegative continuous function f whose integral is m(K)^2 > 0. Thus f must be positive on some open interval - but f is positive precisely on K+K.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Are you sure that convolution is continuous? Why? Do you have a link? You state that the convolution is positive exactly on K+K, but K+K is compact and continuous function is positive on the open set.
 
  • #7
It's a theorem that if [itex]f \in L^1(\mathbb{R})[/itex] and [itex]g \in L^\infty(\mathbb{R})[/itex] then [itex]f*g[/itex] is continuous. (In fact, the same conclusion holds for [itex]f \in L^p(\mathbb{R})[/itex] and [itex]g \in L^q(\mathbb{R})[/itex], where p and q are convex conjugates.) You can find this in almost any text on harmonic analysis, e.g. it's on page 4 of Rudin's Fourier Analysis on Groups.

The point of my post was the following: Since f is positive precisely on K+K (this statement actually requires a line of proof) and since f is positive on an open interval, then K+K must contain an open interval.
 
  • #8
that's very neat.
One thing though, f is positive on a subset of K+K (rather than precisely on K+K), which is exactly what was needed - and the condition that K is compact wasn't needed, only finite measure.

...and to show that convolution f*g is continuous is easy when g is continuous. The general case follows by taking limits.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I proved thjat [tex]f[/tex] is continuous an that the open set [tex]U=\{x\in\mathbb{R}\,:\,f(x)>0\}[/tex] is the subset of [tex]K+K[/tex]. But, how to prove that the set [tex]U[/tex] is nonempty? In fact, [tex]f(x)=m(K\cap(x-K))[/tex].
 
  • #10
Note that if {f>0} was empty then the integral of f would be zero. Can you say what the integral of f is?
 
  • #11
OK, application of Fubini's theorem gives [tex]\int_{\mathbb{R}}f\,dm=m(K)^2>0[/tex]. Thanks.
 

FAQ: Does the Compact Set K+K Have Nonempty Interior?

What is a compact set of positive measure?

A compact set of positive measure is a set of points in a given space that has a finite size, or measure, and contains at least one point. This means that the set is bounded and has a non-zero measure.

How is a compact set of positive measure different from a compact set?

A compact set can have a measure of zero, while a compact set of positive measure must have a non-zero measure. This means that a compact set of positive measure contains more points than a regular compact set.

What is the importance of compact sets of positive measure in mathematical analysis?

Compact sets of positive measure are important in mathematical analysis because they allow for the application of various theorems and techniques, such as the Heine-Borel theorem, which states that a subset of a compact set is also compact. This allows for the study and analysis of more complex mathematical systems.

Can a set have a positive measure but not be compact?

Yes, a set can have a positive measure but not be compact. For example, the set of real numbers between 0 and 1 has a positive measure but is not compact, as it is unbounded.

How are compact sets of positive measure used in real-world applications?

Compact sets of positive measure have various applications in real-world problems, such as in the study of physical systems and the analysis of data. They are also used in optimization problems and in the study of probability and statistics.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
685
Replies
16
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top