Does the Mean Value Theorem Guarantee a Function Value of 4?

That is, \int_1^c f(t)dt= 4 and \int_1^x f(t)dt is continuous so the intermediate value theorem applies: there must exist c between 1 and c such that \int_1^c f(t)dt= 4.
  • #1
courtrigrad
1,236
2
If [tex] f [/tex] is continuous and [tex] \int^{3}_{1} f(x) dx = 8 [/tex], show that [tex] f [/tex] takes on the value 4 at least once on the interval [1,3] . I know that the average value of [tex] f(x) [/tex] is 4. So does this imply that [tex] f_{ave} = f(c) = 4 [/tex] and [tex] f(x) [/tex] takes on the value of 4 at least once on the interval [1,3] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'd go with contradiction. Suppose there is no x0 in [1,3] such that f(x0)=4. With that assumption, what does the mean value thm says about the values f can take on [1,3]? There are two cases, etc.
 
  • #3
courtrigrad said:
If [tex] f [/tex] is continuous and [tex] \int^{3}_{1} f(x) dx = 8 [/tex], show that [tex] f [/tex] takes on the value 4 at least once on the interval [1,3] . I know that the average value of [tex] f(x) [/tex] is 4. So does this imply that [tex] f_{ave} = f(c) = 4 [/tex] and [tex] f(x) [/tex] takes on the value of 4 at least once on the interval [1,3] ?
Yes, but not directly--the mean value theorem is about derivatives. What is the derivative of g(x) = [tex] \int_{3}^{x} f(t) dt [/tex]?
 
  • #4
quasar987 said:
I'd go with contradiction. Suppose there is no x0 in [1,3] such that f(x0)=4. With that assumption, what does the mean value thm says about the values f can take on [1,3]? There are two cases, etc.

make that the intermediate value thm, sorry.

Anyway, courtigrad's way is a little bit faster, more elegant and "on topic" provided this is an exercice designed to make you apply the mean valut thm.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Thanks for your help. Let's say I want to prove (not rigorously) the Mean Value Theorem for Integrals, [tex] \int_{a}^{b} f(x)\dx = f(c)(b-a) [/tex] by using the Mean Value Theorem for Derivatives to the function [tex] F(x) = \int^{x}_{a} f(t)\dt [/tex]. We know that [tex] F(x) [/tex] is continuous on [a,x] and differentiable on (a,x) . So [tex] F(x) - F(a) = f(c)(x-a) [/tex] or [tex] \frac{\int^{b}_{a} f(t)\dt - \int_{a}^{a} f(t)\dt}{b-a} = f(c)(b-a) [/tex]. So [tex] f(c) = \frac{1}{b-a}\int_{a}^{b} f(t)\dt [/tex]. Is this correct?

Thanks
 
  • #6
minus the extra (b-a) in the second to last equation, I'd say this is a perfectly acceptable and rigourous proof of the mean value thm for integral. Nice job!
 
  • #7
This step
[tex] \frac{\int^{b}_{a} f(t)\dt - \int_{a}^{a} f(t)\dt}{b-a} = f(c)(b-a) [/tex]
is not true. Also instead of just writing equations, you should explain what you're doing--for example you should say, "where c is some value between a and b" and you should say when you use the mean value theorem or fundamental theorem of calculus to justify a step.

Because of the way you've presented it, I'm not sure if you are already aware of this, but what is d(F(x))/dx? What is F(a) and F(b)?
 
  • #8
[tex] \frac{dF(x)}{dx} = f(t) [/tex]. [tex] F(a) = 0 [/tex] and [tex] F(b) = \int_{a}^{b} f(t) [/tex]
 
  • #9
(you rock!) :biggrin:

But I agree with ortho on the last part: in an exam, you'd most certainly lose points for not expliciting your reasoning in terms of the condition of applicability of the thm, etc. For instance, the step that goes,

courtrigrad said:
We know that [tex] F(x) [/tex] is continuous on [a,x] and differentiable on (a,x) . So [tex] F(x) - F(a) = f(c)(x-a) [/tex]

should read "We know by one version of the fond thm of calculus that under the assumption of the continuity of f on [a,b], [tex] F(x) [/tex] is continuous on [a,b] , differentiable on (a,b) and that F'(x)=f(x). Therefor, by the mean value thm, there exists a number c in (a,b) such that F(b)-F(a)=F'(c)(b-a). But F'(c) = f(c), [itex]F(b)=\int_a^b f(t)dt[/itex], F(a)=[itex]\int_a^a f(t)dt=0[/itex], hence the result."
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Let [itex]F(x)= \int_1^x f(t)dt[/itex]. Then [itex]F(1)= \int_1^1 f(t)dt= 0[/itex] and [itex]F(3)= \int_1^3 f(t)dt= 8[/itex] so [itex]\frac{F(3)- F(1)}{3- 1}= \frac{8- 0}{2}= 4[/itex]. By the mean value theorem then, there must exist c between 1 and 3 such that F'(c)= f(c)= 4.
 

FAQ: Does the Mean Value Theorem Guarantee a Function Value of 4?

What is the Mean Value Theorem?

The Mean Value Theorem is a fundamental theorem in calculus that states that if a function is continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on the open interval, then there exists at least one point in the interval where the slope of the tangent line is equal to the average rate of change of the function over the interval.

How is the Mean Value Theorem used in calculus?

The Mean Value Theorem is used to prove other important theorems in calculus, such as the Intermediate Value Theorem and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. It is also used to find the value of a derivative at a specific point on a graph, and to determine the behavior of a function over a given interval.

What are the conditions for the Mean Value Theorem to hold true?

The Mean Value Theorem requires that the function is continuous on a closed interval and differentiable on the open interval. Additionally, the endpoints of the interval must have the same value for the function.

How is the Mean Value Theorem related to Rolle's Theorem?

Rolle's Theorem is a special case of the Mean Value Theorem, where the average rate of change over the interval is equal to zero. This means that there exists at least one point in the interval where the derivative of the function is equal to zero, or where the function has a horizontal tangent line.

Can the Mean Value Theorem be applied to all types of functions?

No, the Mean Value Theorem can only be applied to continuous and differentiable functions. If a function is not continuous on a closed interval or differentiable on the open interval, the Mean Value Theorem cannot be used.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top