Does the morphism above imply the other way around, ie, y->x?

  • Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the role of technology in education and how it can be used effectively to enhance learning. The speakers also touch on the importance of balancing technology use with traditional teaching methods and the potential negative effects of excessive screen time. They conclude that technology can be a valuable tool in education, but it should be used in moderation and with purpose.
  • #1
MathematicalPhysicist
Gold Member
4,699
373
my question: does the morphism above imply the other way around, ie, y->x?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well...if it's bijective...yes...and it's a homomorphism...I guess...[?]
 
  • #3
Originally posted by loop quantum gravity
my question: does the morphism above imply the other way around, ie, y->x?

there is a set of morphisms between any objects in your category. so while it is not correct to say that x-->y implies y-->x, it is true that there exists a set of morphisms (which might be trivial) from y-->x. but this is not dependent on the morphisms from x-->y
 

FAQ: Does the morphism above imply the other way around, ie, y->x?

What is a morphism in mathematics?

A morphism is a mathematical concept that describes a structure-preserving mapping between two mathematical objects. It can be seen as a generalization of functions, where the objects involved can be more complex than numbers or sets.

How is a morphism defined?

A morphism is defined as a mapping between two objects that preserves their algebraic structure. This means that the relationship between the objects is maintained under the mapping, and the operations on the objects are preserved.

What is the implication of a morphism?

The implication of a morphism is that it establishes a relationship between two objects based on their algebraic structure. This relationship can be used to understand the properties of the objects and to make predictions about their behavior.

Does the morphism y->x imply the opposite direction, x->y?

No, the direction of a morphism does not necessarily imply the opposite direction. It is possible for a morphism to be one-way, where the mapping only goes from one object to the other. However, in some cases, there may be a bijective morphism where the mapping works both ways.

How can we determine if a morphism works both ways?

To determine if a morphism works both ways, we can use the concept of invertibility. If a morphism is invertible, then it has an inverse mapping that goes in the opposite direction, and the relationship between the objects is maintained in both directions. However, not all morphisms are invertible, and some may only work in one direction.

Similar threads

Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
954
Replies
21
Views
824
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top