Does the Series with Terms 1/n^α Converge or Diverge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dodobird
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the convergence of the series ∑(1/n^α) based on the value of α. It is established that the series converges for all real α > 1 and diverges for α ≤ 1. Participants mention various convergence tests, including the Cauchy condensation test and the integral test, while noting that some techniques are not permitted due to the course's current focus. The use of Abel's summation and comparisons with known divergent series are suggested as methods to approach the proof. The conversation reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the application of these mathematical concepts.
Dodobird
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the following sequence \sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n^\alpha}
for all real \alpha > 1 converges and for all real \alpha \leq 1
diverges.

The Attempt at a Solution


All I know is that the Abel-Summation is the only useful thing here, but I got no clue how to use it the right way and I heard that the common criteria won´t work.

I would be thankful for any hints or clues to get this proof running. Thank you in advance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


First of all, this is a series and not a sequence.

Second. Have you seen things like the integral test?? Can you list all the tests which you've seen and think are useful?
 


Break it up into cases. There are 3 cases for you to consider here.
 


Thanks micromass and zondrina for your quick help

I´m sorry for the misconception. I meant series, sorry about that. Well our teacher told us/me that the quotient and/or root-test aren´t helpful here because the first one shows convergence and the second one divergence. He then talked about the summation by parts (Abel) and proved it with Weierstraß. I´m not sure if I´m allowed to use the integral-test on that because newer proofing techniques are forbidden until we have reached and proved them. I already got comfortable with sequences but the pace is so fast that we haven´t even got taught on series and now we got to prove something which is so new. I apologize for my bad English but I´m from abroad.
 


Is the integral test the same like the cauchy-criterion?
 


The integral test allows you to test for the convergence of your series as long as f(n) is a monotone decreasing function ( Since you're starting at n=1 you don't have much to worry about ).
 


Hi Zondrina and all the other helpers/readers. I used the Cauchy-Condensationtest:

For convergence:

s_n = \sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty a_1+a_2+a_3+...+a_n

with the estimate

s_N=a_2+a_2+a_4+a_4+a_4+a_4+a_8+...+N*a_N<br /> =2a_2+4a_4+...+N*a_N<br /> =2(a_2+2a_4+...+ (\frac N2)*a_N)

with

N= 2^k


s_{2^k} =2(a_2)+2(a_4)+...+(2^{k-1})*a_k)=\sum\limits_{k=1}^n (a^k)a_{2^k}

For divergence:

t_n = \sum\limits_{k=1}^n \frac 1k

With the comparison test
s_n \leq t_n

\sum\limits_{k=1}^n (a^k)a_{2^k} \leq \sum\limits_{k=1}^n \frac 1k

mit a_{2^k} = \frac 1k

The expression \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum\limits_{k=1}^n 1 goes to infinity, so \sum\limits_{k=1}^n \frac 1k goes as well to infinity.


Is this correct?
 


Would be cool if some1 could check it. If I´m close to the solution. Thank you.
 


Okay well thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K