Does this theorem have a name?

  • Thread starter techmologist
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Theorem
In summary: HIn summary, the integral of the tangent and normal vectors over a surface bounded by a curve is equal to the negative of twice the mean curvature of the surface integrated over the surface. This result can be derived using Stokes' theorem and the vector identity for the curl of a cross product. The mean curvature of a surface can be defined as half the trace of the second fundamental form, which can be calculated using the inverse of the metric tensor and the surface's normal vector.
  • #1
techmologist
306
12
For a surface S bounded by a curve C,

[tex]\int_{C} \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n}ds = -2\int_{S} H \mathbf{n}da[/tex]

t is the unit tangent to C, and n is the unit normal to the surface S. H is the mean curvature of S. It can be derived from Stokes' theorem, but it seems like the kind of result that might have been known earlier.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
For any constant vector c,

[tex] \mathbf{c} \cdot \int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_C (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{t} ds =\int_S \nabla \times (\mathbf{n} \times \mathbf{c}) \cdot \mathbf{n}da [/tex]

Using the vector identity

[tex]\nabla \times (\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b}) = \mathbf{b} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{a} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{b} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{a} ) \mathbf{b} + (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{b} )\mathbf{a} [/tex]

and the fact that c is constant, the above integral becomes

[tex]\int_S [\mathbf{c}\cdot \nabla \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n})\mathbf{c} ] \cdot \mathbf{n} da
=
\mathbf{c} \cdot \int_S (\nabla \mathbf{n} ) \cdot \mathbf{n} - (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n }) \mathbf{n} da [/tex]

The first term in the integrand is zero, since it is just the gradient of the length of the unit normal. Also, since the vector c was arbitrary, its dot product with the integral can be dropped:


[tex]\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = -\int_S (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n} ) \mathbf{n} da [/tex]

Depending on how you define the normal (outward or inward), div n = -2H up to a sign*. So that gives the result

[tex]\int_C \mathbf{t} \times \mathbf{n} ds = \int_S 2H \mathbf{n} da [/tex]

I had an extra minus sign in the first post.


* The mean curvature H of a surface is equal to half the trace of the second fundamental form B: 2H = gjkbjk. The components of the second fundamental form can be defined as

[tex]b_{jk} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = -\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{n}_{,k} = - n^i_{{ };k}\mathbf{x}_j \cdot \mathbf{x}_i = -n^i_{{ };k}g_{ij}[/tex]

Multiplying both sides by the inverse of g_ij and then summing the diagonal elements gives

[tex]g^{jk}b_{jk} = - n^k_{{ };k} = -\nabla \cdot \mathbf{n}[/tex]
 
Last edited:

FAQ: Does this theorem have a name?

What is the purpose of naming a theorem?

The purpose of naming a theorem is to make it easier to identify and reference in academic and scientific literature. It also allows for easier communication and collaboration among researchers and scientists.

How are theorems typically named?

Theorems are typically named after the mathematician or scientist who discovered or first proved them, or after a significant aspect or application of the theorem.

Who has the authority to name a theorem?

The authority to name a theorem lies with the mathematician or scientist who first discovers or proves the theorem. However, in some cases, a group of researchers may collectively agree on a name for a theorem.

Are there any rules or guidelines for naming theorems?

There are no set rules or guidelines for naming theorems, but there are some common practices. For example, the name should be concise, relevant to the content of the theorem, and not already used for another theorem. It should also be easily pronounceable and memorable.

Can a theorem be renamed?

Yes, a theorem can be renamed if new evidence or research suggests that the original name is not accurate or appropriate. This is typically done through a consensus among the scientific community and in recognition of the original discoverer's contributions.

Back
Top