Does U-Substitution Function as the Inverse of the Chain Rule?

In summary, the article explores the relationship between u-substitution and the chain rule in calculus. It argues that u-substitution can be viewed as the inverse operation of the chain rule, as it allows for the simplification of integrals involving composite functions. By transforming variables, u-substitution effectively reverses the process of differentiation represented by the chain rule, thereby facilitating the integration of complex functions. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding this connection for solving calculus problems effectively.
  • #1
NoahsArk
Gold Member
258
24
TL;DR Summary
I don't get it.
Can someone please give as simple an example as possible to show what U substitution is about? I know basic integration rules but don't understand the point of u-substitution. I've read that it's used to "undo the chain rule", but I don't see how, and don't see how we can spot when we'd need to reverse the chain rule for integration as opposed to just following the normal rule for integration ( adding one to the exponent and dividing by the exponent plus 1). Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
NoahsArk said:
TL;DR Summary: I don't get it.

Can someone please give as simple an example as possible to show what U substitution is about? I know basic integration rules but don't understand the point of u-substitution. I've read that it's used to "undo the chain rule", but I don't see how, and don't see how we can spot when we'd need to reverse the chain rule for integration as opposed to just following the normal rule for integration ( adding one to the exponent and dividing by the exponent plus 1). Thanks
I thought we went through all this in a thread some time ago?
 
  • #3
@PeroK I remember asking about the chain rule and implicit differentiation, but not about u substitution. If I did ask about it and you have a link to the prior discussion, please paste it. Thanks
 
  • #5
  • #6
NoahsArk said:
TL;DR Summary: I don't get it.

Can someone please give as simple an example as possible to show what U substitution is about?
Here's an example that is similar to a question that was recently asked.
$$\int x(x^2 + 3)^3 ~dx$$
You could of course multiply out the square term to get a 7th degree polynomial, but using ordinary substitution is more efficient.

Using the substitution ##u = x^2 + 3## from which we get ##du = 2xdx##, we can rewrite the integral as ##\int u^3 \frac 1 2 du = \frac 1 2 \int u^3 du##. You can then use the power rule for integrals to evaluate the revised integral. Once the integration is performed, undo the substitution.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes gmax137, NoahsArk, PeroK and 1 other person
  • #7
Another example is:
$$ I = \int \sin{x} cos{x} dx $$
It's not obvious how to do this. But if I set $$ u = \sin{x}, du = \cos{x} dx $$, then we have:
$$ I = \int u du = 1/2 u^2 = 1/2 \sin^2{x} $$
 
  • Like
Likes gmax137, NoahsArk and PhDeezNutz
  • #8
phyzguy said:
then we have: $$ I = \int u du = 1/2 u^2 = 1/2 \sin^2{x} $$
Although the above is correct, some might (incorrectly) interpret the last two expressions as ##\frac 1 {2u^2}## and ##\frac 1 {2\sin^2(x)}##.

These are less prone to misinterpretation as ##\frac {u^2}2## and ##\frac{\sin^2(x)}2## or ##\frac 1 2 u^2## and ##\frac 1 2 \sin^2(x)##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes phyzguy and PeroK
  • #9
Thank you for the responses.
 
  • Like
Likes gmax137
  • #10
Elaborating a little more on my example, and how u substitution is basically the inverse of the chain rule. If you have:$$ \frac{d}{dx} \frac{sin^2(x)}{2}$$
Applying the chain rule, you get:
$$ \frac{d}{dx} \frac{sin^2(x)}{2} = \frac{d}{d(sin(x))}\frac{sin^2(x)}{2} \frac{d}{dx} sin(x) = sin(x) cos(x)$$
Do you see how this is really just the inverse of the u substitution we did above?
 
  • #11
phyzguy said:
Elaborating a little more on my example, and how u substitution is basically the inverse of the chain rule. If you have:$$ \frac{d}{dx} \frac{sin^2(x)}{2}$$
Applying the chain rule, you get:
$$ \frac{d}{dx} \frac{sin^2(x)}{2} = \frac{d}{d(sin(x))}\frac{sin^2(x)}{2} \frac{d}{dx} sin(x) = sin(x) cos(x)$$
Do you see how this is really just the inverse of the u substitution we did above?
The change of variables is really the inverse of the chain rule. Formally, if ##f## and ##u## are suitable functions:
$$\int_a^bf(u(x))u'(x) \ dx = \int_{u(a)}^{u(b)}f(t) \ dt$$The proof is relatively simple:

Let ##F(y) = \int_0^y f(t)dt##. By the FTC (Fundamental Theorem of Calculus), ##F'(y) = f(y)##.

Let ##g(x) = F(u(x))##. By the chain rule: ##g'(x) = F'(u(x))u'(x) = f(u(x))u'(x)##.

Hence:
$$\int_a^bf(u(x))u'(x) \ dx = \int_a^bg'(x) \ dx = g(b) - g(a) = F(u(b)) - F(u(a))$$$$ = \int_{0}^{u(b)}f(t) \ dt - \int_{0}^{u(a)}f(t) \ dt = \int_{u(a)}^{u(b)}f(t) \ dt$$
 
  • Like
Likes NoahsArk, Mark44 and phyzguy

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top