- #1
ismaili
- 160
- 0
As we know, the number of physical degrees of freedom(DoF) for a photon is 2.
I can understand this by gauging away redundant DoF's by gauge fixing.
For example, in QED, by fixing the Lorentz gauge [tex] \partial_\mu A^\mu = 0 [/tex],
we could get rid of one DoF, moreover, the residual gauge symmetry, which is
[tex] A^\mu \rightarrow A^\mu + \partial^\mu f(x) [/tex]
with [tex] \partial^2 f = 0 [/tex] could allow us to remove another DoF.
This means the physical DoF of a photon is 2.
------
However, on the other hand, we know that the virtual photon
which appearing in the internal legs of Feynman diagrams could have some longitudinal component.
And this longitudinal DoF could interact with other particles in a Feynman diagram.
However, this means the above symmetry argument in the first part of my post could NOT apply
to virtual photons. I don't know why. We could always gauge away two DoF's,
however, consideration of Feynman diagrams says that we could only gauge away 1 DoF of
virtual particles, why is that?
Thanks!
I can understand this by gauging away redundant DoF's by gauge fixing.
For example, in QED, by fixing the Lorentz gauge [tex] \partial_\mu A^\mu = 0 [/tex],
we could get rid of one DoF, moreover, the residual gauge symmetry, which is
[tex] A^\mu \rightarrow A^\mu + \partial^\mu f(x) [/tex]
with [tex] \partial^2 f = 0 [/tex] could allow us to remove another DoF.
This means the physical DoF of a photon is 2.
------
However, on the other hand, we know that the virtual photon
which appearing in the internal legs of Feynman diagrams could have some longitudinal component.
And this longitudinal DoF could interact with other particles in a Feynman diagram.
However, this means the above symmetry argument in the first part of my post could NOT apply
to virtual photons. I don't know why. We could always gauge away two DoF's,
however, consideration of Feynman diagrams says that we could only gauge away 1 DoF of
virtual particles, why is that?
Thanks!