Double Counting Proof of Combinatorial Equation: n,k $\in$ $\mathbb{N}$, n > k

  • Thread starter tylerc1991
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, the conversation discusses how to prove the equation \sum_{k = 1}^n k \cdot \binom{n}{k}^2 = n \cdot \binom{2n - 1}{n - 1} using the double counting proof technique. The participants suggest finding a set of objects that both the left and right sides of the equation count, and it is mentioned that the RHS is easier to work with. It is then suggested to consider constructing a committee with n women and n-1 men, and choosing a woman as the chief director for a subcommittee of size n-1. It is shown that this committee can be counted in two ways, giving the RHS of the equation. The
  • #1
tylerc1991
166
0

Homework Statement



For some [itex]n, k \in \mathbb{N}[/itex], where [itex]n > k[/itex], prove

[itex] \sum_{k = 1}^n k \cdot \binom{n}{k}^2 = n \cdot \binom{2n - 1}{n - 1}[/itex]

by using the double counting proof technique.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So we have to find a set of objects such that both the LHS and the RHS of the above equation count the number of objects in this set.

It looks like the RHS of the above equation is easier to work with, so we should find out what the RHS counts, then show that the LHS counts these same objects.

Suppose a committee consists of [itex]n[/itex] women and [itex]n - 1[/itex] men. Say we wish to construct a subcommittee of size [itex]n - 1[/itex] and choose one of the women to be the chief director of this subcommittee. We see that there are

[itex]\binom{n + n - 1}{n - 1} \cdot \binom{n}{1} = n \cdot \binom{2n - 1}{n - 1}[/itex]

ways of constructing such a committee and selecting a woman as the chief director. This gives us the RHS of the required equation, and this is where I get stuck. Ideas?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
tylerc1991 said:
So we have to find a set of objects such that both the LHS and the RHS of the above equation count the number of objects in this set.

It looks like the RHS of the above equation is easier to work with, so we should find out what the RHS counts, then show that the LHS counts these same objects.

Suppose a committee consists of [itex]n[/itex] women and [itex]n - 1[/itex] men. Say we wish to construct a subcommittee of size [itex]n - 1[/itex] and choose one of the women to be the chief director of this subcommittee. We see that there are

[itex]\binom{n + n - 1}{n - 1} \cdot \binom{n}{1} = n \cdot \binom{2n - 1}{n - 1}[/itex]

ways of constructing such a committee and selecting a woman as the chief director. This gives us the RHS of the required equation, and this is where I get stuck. Ideas?

Thank you!

Got it.

Instead of constructing a [itex]n - 1[/itex] size committee, construct a [itex]n[/itex] size committee and it is easy to see that the LHS equals the RHS.
 

FAQ: Double Counting Proof of Combinatorial Equation: n,k $\in$ $\mathbb{N}$, n > k

What is the purpose of using "Double Counting" in combinatorial equations?

The purpose of using "Double Counting" in combinatorial equations is to provide a more rigorous and systematic way of proving the validity of the equation. It involves counting the same set of objects in two different ways and equating the two counts to prove the equation.

Can "Double Counting" be used for any type of combinatorial equation?

Yes, "Double Counting" can be used for any type of combinatorial equation as long as there is a way to count the same set of objects in two different ways. However, it may not always be the most efficient or straightforward method of proof.

Are there any limitations to using "Double Counting" as a proof technique?

One limitation of using "Double Counting" as a proof technique is that it may not always be obvious how to count the same set of objects in two different ways. In some cases, finding the second count may require a lot of creativity and may not be straightforward.

How does "Double Counting" differ from other proof techniques such as induction or direct proof?

"Double Counting" differs from other proof techniques in that it relies on the principle of counting the same set of objects in two different ways. Induction and direct proof, on the other hand, use logical reasoning and mathematical operations to prove an equation.

Can "Double Counting" be used in other fields of science or is it specific to combinatorial equations?

While "Double Counting" is commonly used in combinatorics, it can also be applied in other fields of science such as physics and biology. In these fields, it may be used to count different physical or biological quantities in two different ways and equate them to prove an equation or relationship.

Back
Top