Double int needs a good T-form, got one?

  • Thread starter benorin
  • Start date
In summary, the given problem involves proving the equality of two integrals using the beta integral and a change of variables. After applying the beta integral, the right hand side can be rewritten as an integral with limits of 0 and 1. The left hand side involves a change of variables and the use of the beta integral again. The missing step is to use a transformation of variables to match the terms with "n" in the exponents between the two integrals. A possible solution is to use the change of variables t=1-(1-y)/(1-w) on the inner "y" integral.
  • #1
benorin
Homework Helper
Insights Author
1,443
191
I found this problem on http://endeavor.macusa.net/mathpropress/ :

Prove that

[tex]\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{1} f(xy)(1-x)^{m-1}y^{m}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dx \, dy = \frac{\Gamma (m)\Gamma (n)}{\Gamma (m+n)}\int_{0}^{1} f(z)(1-z)^{m+n-1} \, dz[/tex]​

where f(xy) is an arbitrary function of xy.

My work: The beta integral gives [tex] B(m,n) =\frac{\Gamma (m)\Gamma (n)}{\Gamma (m+n)}=\int_{0}^{1}t^{m-1}(1-t)^{n-1} \, dt[/tex]

hence the the righthand-side of the given problem becomes:


[tex]\frac{\Gamma (m)\Gamma (n)}{\Gamma (m+n)}\int_{0}^{1} f(z) (1-z)^{m+n-1} \, dz= \int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{1} f(z) (1-z)^{m+n-1}t^{m-1}(1-t)^{n-1} \, dz \, dt [/tex]​

also, as for the lefthand-side of the given problem I have considered applying the change of variables [tex]w=xy\Rightarrow dw = y dx[/tex] so that [tex] 0\leq x\leq 1\Rightarrow 0\leq w\leq y[/tex] and the integral becomes

[tex]\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{1} f(xy)(1-x)^{m-1}y^{m}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dx \, dy = \int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{y} f(w)\left( 1-\frac{w}{y} \right) ^{m-1}y^{m}(1-y)^{n-1} \, \frac{dw}{y} \, dy [/tex]
[tex]= \int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{y} f(w)\left( y-w \right) ^{m-1}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dw \, dy[/tex]​

but now what? the alternative change of variables [tex]w=xy\Rightarrow dw = x dy[/tex] so that [tex] 0\leq y\leq 1\Rightarrow 0\leq w\leq x[/tex] yields instead this

[tex]\int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{1} f(xy)(1-x)^{m-1}y^{m}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dx \, dy = \int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{x} f(w)(1-x)^{m-1} \left( \frac{w}{x} \right) ^{m}\left( 1-\frac{w}{x} \right) ^{n-1} \, \frac{dw}{x} \, dx [/tex]​

which also seems to be somewhat lacking. Should I try expanding by the binomial theorem (I do not assume that m and n are integers, but rather that their real parts are > 0) ?

Any thoughts? A transformation of variables of the form T:{u=u(x,y), v=v(u,v)} perhaps ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I give up on this.

You should try the calculus forums, you might have a better chance of getting help there.
 
  • #3
benorin said:
[tex]= \int_{0}^{1}\int_{0}^{y} f(w)\left( y-w \right) ^{m-1}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dw \, dy[/tex]

but now what?

Almost there. Change the order of integration to 'protect' the f(w) (the idea being a change of variables on y won't muck up our f(w)):

[tex]= \int_{0}^{1} f(w)\left(\int_{w}^{1}\left( y-w \right) ^{m-1}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dy\right) \, dw[/tex]

and work on the inner integral. We'd like to get the interval of integration of the inner integral to go from 0 to 1 rather than w to 1, so try a change of variables on y with this in mind. Or you might want to think of trying to match up the terms with "n" in the exponents between this integral and the right hand side (after you substituted the beta integral that is, the one with the "t" and "z" in it).
 
  • #4
Thanks shmoe!

shmoe said:
Almost there.
[tex]= \int_{0}^{1} f(w)\left(\int_{w}^{1}\left( y-w \right) ^{m-1}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dy\right) \, dw[/tex]

Almost indeed! Recall (or look it up in the CRC table integrals as I did) that

[tex]\int_{a}^{b} (y-a)^{m-1}(b-y)^{n-1} \, dy = (b-a)^{m+n-1} B(m,n) = (b-a)^{m+n-1}\frac{\Gamma (m)\Gamma (n)}{\Gamma (m+n)}[/tex]

for [tex]b>a, \Re (m)>0, \Re (n)>0[/tex]

hence

[tex] \int_{0}^{1} f(w)\left(\int_{w}^{1}\left( y-w \right) ^{m-1}(1-y)^{n-1} \, dy\right) \, dw = \frac{\Gamma (m)\Gamma (n)}{\Gamma (m+n)}\int_{0}^{1} f(w)(1-w)^{m+n-1} \, dw [/tex]

as required.

Thanks shmoe! you kick-ass.
 
  • #5
Happy to help, it's a cute looking problem.

benorin said:
(or look it up in the CRC table integrals as I did) that...

No cheating required! :-p

Try the change of variables t=1-(1-y)/(1-w) on the inner "y" integral.

A similar change of variables would likely prove what you found in CRC, something linear to take the interval [a,b] to [0,1]. (I haven't tried the details on this one but I'd wager it will work)
 

FAQ: Double int needs a good T-form, got one?

What is a "double int"?

A "double int" refers to a data type in computer programming that stores a number with decimal places.

Why does a double int need a good T-form?

A "T-form" or "format" is used to specify how a value should be displayed or interpreted. In the case of a double int, a good T-form ensures that the decimal places are correctly represented and that the value is easy to read and understand.

How do I know if my T-form is good?

A good T-form for a double int should have a consistent number of decimal places and use appropriate symbols or formatting to separate the decimal places from the whole number. It should also be easy to read and understand.

Can I use any T-form for a double int?

No, it is important to use a T-form that is appropriate for the specific programming language or system you are using. Different languages may have different conventions for displaying numbers with decimal places, so it is important to use the correct format.

How can I improve the T-form for my double int?

To improve the T-form for a double int, you can research the conventions and best practices for displaying numbers with decimal places in your specific programming language or system. You can also test different T-forms and ask for feedback from other programmers to determine which one is the most effective and readable.

Back
Top