Double Integrals over General Regions: "Well-Behaved" Curve

  • Thread starter BoundByAxioms
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Curve
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of integrating a function over regions of general shape using a new function defined on a rectangular region. It also mentions a theorem that shows the existence of the integral if the function is continuous and the boundary curve is "well-behaved." The conversation further delves into a technical explanation for this concept, which involves the fundamental theorem of calculus and the measure of discontinuities.
  • #1
BoundByAxioms
99
0
"Well-Behaved" curve

I am reviewing/browsing through Stewart's Early Transcendentals and had a question about the section on Double Integrals over General Regions. It says that in order to integrate a function f over regions D of a general shape, we suppose D is a bounded region that can be enclosed in a rectangular region R. Then a new function F with domain R is defined :

F(x,y) = f(x,y) if (x,y) is in D, and F(x,y) = 0 if (x,y) is in R but not in D.

Then, a theorem is stated:

[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{D}[/tex]f(x,y)dA=[tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{R}[/tex]F(x,y)dA.And then (finally, getting to my question) it says that if f is continuous on D and the boundary curve of D is "well behaved" (in a sense outside the scope of this book), then it can be shown that [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{R}[/tex]F(x,y)dA exists and therefore [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{D}[/tex]f(x,y)dA exists. What does it mean by well-behaved, and can someone offer an elementary explanation as to why the boundary curve of D must be well behaved in order for [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{R}[/tex]F(x,y)dA to exist, and why that implies that [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\int_{D}[/tex]f(x,y)dA exists?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


As for a technical explanation, forgive me, for I have only completed a more basic course in multivariable calculus, and have not been formally introduced to the more rigorous proofs involving calculus.

As for the basic idea though, if the curve is well behaved (most likely implying that it has derivatives across your region R that are well defined), than the double integral (antiderivative over the region enclosed, D), follows by the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Essentially a fundamental theorem of calculus expanded to two variables.
 
  • #3


In my opinion, problems might arise in the case where the boundary of D has measure >0. Because recall the characterization of a Riemann integrable function... F:R-->R (bounded) is integrable iff its set of discontinuities is of measure 0. If the boundary of D has measure >0, unless f(x)=0 almost everywhere on the boundary of D, then F will not be integrable on R by the above characterization.
 

FAQ: Double Integrals over General Regions: "Well-Behaved" Curve

What is a "well-behaved" curve in the context of double integrals over general regions?

A "well-behaved" curve is a curve that can be easily described and integrated over. In the context of double integrals over general regions, a well-behaved curve is typically one that is smooth, continuous, and does not have any sharp turns or corners.

How is a double integral over a well-behaved curve different from a regular double integral?

A double integral over a well-behaved curve is typically easier to calculate and often results in a more accurate answer. This is because the curve is more easily described and can be integrated over using standard integration techniques.

Can any curve be considered "well-behaved" for the purpose of double integrals over general regions?

No, not all curves can be considered "well-behaved". Some curves may have sharp turns, discontinuities, or other irregularities that make them difficult to integrate over. In these cases, alternative methods may need to be used to calculate the double integral.

How is the region of integration determined when calculating a double integral over a well-behaved curve?

The region of integration is typically determined by the bounds of the curve itself. For example, if the curve is defined by the equation y = x^2, then the region of integration would be determined by the x-values that define the curve.

Are there any limitations to using double integrals over well-behaved curves?

While double integrals over well-behaved curves can be useful for calculating certain types of integrals, they may not always be the most efficient method. In some cases, other methods such as polar coordinates or change of variables may be more appropriate.

Similar threads

Back
Top