Double slit experiment with a glass-covered slit of unknown n

In summary, the interference pattern shift is 5 fringes for an experiment using a helium-neon laser with a wavelength of 633 nm and a slit separation of 12mm. When the experiment is repeated under water, the shift is only 3 fringes. If the the refractive index for the water-air interface is 1.33, find:a) the thickness of the glass sheetb) its refractive index
  • #1
Nerrad
20
0

Homework Statement


A double-slit experiment uses a helium-neon laser with a wavelength of 633 nm and a slit separation of 12mm. When a thin sheet of glass is placed in front of one of the slits, the interference pattern shifts by 5 fringes. When the experiment is repeated under water, the shift is only 3 fringes. If the the refractive index for the water-air interface is 1.33, find:
a) the thickness of the glass sheet
b) its refractive index

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that the light beam is being diffracted through the sheet of glass, thus having to travel a longer path and that's why the interference pattern is shifted, but I don't know how to formulate the whole problem. Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
One hint I can give you is that without the glass in front of one slit, straight ahead the two sources are in phase. The statement "shifts by 5 fringes" tells you straight ahead the two sources are now 5 wavelengths out of phase because of the extra path through the glass (the glass has higher index than air, accounting for a phase difference from that of the path with no glass). The part where it says the same experiment was performed under water, is somewhat unclear to me=I think they are simply referring to the slit and the glass being put in a container with water with the screen where the pattern is observed is in air, with basically a transparent container with water holding the slit with the glass in front of it. In this case, the path without glass contains water, (instead of air), so the phase difference isn't nearly as much, and results in 3 wavelengths of shift. Try writing out equations for the phase shift in both cases as a function of the index ## n ## of the glass and thickness ## d ## of the glass. ## \\ ## Editing: The second part can also be worked with the entire apparatus under water=perhaps your instructor can clarify the complete details.
 
  • #3
Charles Link said:
One hint I can give you is that without the glass in front of one slit, straight ahead the two sources are in phase. The statement "shifts by 5 fringes" tells you straight ahead the two sources are now 5 wavelengths out of phase because of the extra path through the glass (the glass has higher index than air, accounting for a phase difference from that of the path with no glass). The part where it says the same experiment was performed under water, is somewhat unclear to me=I think they are simply referring to the slit and the glass being put in a container with water with the screen where the pattern is observed is in air, with basically a transparent container with water holding the slit with the glass in front of it. In this case, the path without glass contains water, (instead of air), so the phase difference isn't nearly as much, and results in 3 wavelengths of shift. Try writing out equations for the phase shift in both cases as a function of the index ## n ## of the glass and thickness ## d ## of the glass. ## \\ ## Editing: The second part can also be worked with the entire apparatus under water=perhaps your instructor can clarify the complete details.
So for the first bit you're saying that the thickness of the mirror is equal to 5 times the wavelength of the light?
 
  • #4
Nerrad said:
So for the first bit you're saying that the thickness of the mirror is equal to 5 times the wavelength of the light?
It's a thin glass platelet that is only in front of one slit. In optics, there is a concept called optical path length (OPL). The OPL through the glass is ## nd ## and the OPL through the air for the adjacent slit over the same distance is ## 1d ## since the index of air is "1.0". Thereby, coming from the laser to the front of the slit, the two OPL's differ by ## (n-1)d ##, since there is no phase difference when the beam is traveling from the laser through the air, until one portion of the beam encounters glass. I gave you the left side of the first equation=you should be able to write what ## (n-1)d ## must be equal to (in regards to the interference between the two slits). Once you do that, you should also be able to write out the (second) equation with water as the alternative material (rather than air).
 

FAQ: Double slit experiment with a glass-covered slit of unknown n

1. What is the double slit experiment?

The double slit experiment is a classic experiment in physics that demonstrates the wave-particle duality of light and matter. It involves shining a beam of particles (such as electrons or photons) through two parallel slits and observing the resulting pattern on a screen behind the slits.

2. How does the glass cover affect the double slit experiment?

The glass cover introduces an unknown variable, known as the refractive index (n), into the experiment. This variable determines how much the path of the particles will be bent as they pass through the glass, which can affect the resulting interference pattern on the screen.

3. Why is the refractive index of the glass important in this experiment?

The refractive index of the glass is important because it affects the path of the particles as they pass through the glass. This can change the overall behavior and interference pattern of the particles, providing valuable information about the wave-like nature of particles.

4. How can the refractive index of the glass be determined in the double slit experiment?

The refractive index of the glass can be determined by adjusting the distance between the slits and the screen. By measuring the changes in the interference pattern as the distance is varied, the refractive index can be calculated using the known wavelength of the particles and the geometry of the experiment.

5. What implications does the double slit experiment with a glass-covered slit have for our understanding of quantum mechanics?

The double slit experiment with a glass-covered slit highlights the strange and counterintuitive behavior of particles at the quantum level. It provides evidence for the wave-particle duality of particles and challenges our traditional understanding of the nature of matter. This experiment has played a crucial role in shaping our current understanding of quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Back
Top