Double slit experiment with macroscopic size objects

In summary, the double slit experiment is used to show that particles do not behave like grains of sand. The experiment is based on entirely different mathematics to the sand experiment.
  • #1
wonderingingatineau
2
0
Hi; I'm new to the forum and I hope my question is not out of line.

Has anyone ever done double slit experiments with macroscopic objects such as grains of sand, for instance. It seems to me that with appropriately sized and spaced slits in a mask of appropriate thickness, one should be able to reproduce, in the detector (a gel for instance) a pattern that would resemble an interference pattern.

The size of the grains of sand combined with the correct spacing and size of the slits in a mask of appropriate thickness should illustrate that some paths to the detector are possible while others are not, without the necessity of resorting to wave functions to describe the paths.

I would guess that as the separation between the slits, the size of the slits and the thickness of the mask were altered, so too would the "interference" pattern change in the detector.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The biggest thing they done with the double slit experiment was with buckey balls, which is a form of carbon, it is 60 carbon atoms big, which is pretty big in the atomic scale
 
  • #3
The whole point of the double slit experiment is that the interfering particles don't behave like grains of sand.

Firstly, the quanta in the 'true' double slit experiment can follow all possible paths, unlike your sand hypothesis.

Secondly, were you to observe a distribution pattern with the sand experiment, the greatest concentrations of sand would probably be approximately (amount of sand from slit 1) + (amount of sand from slit 2) - reasonable, no?

It turns out that quantum interference patterns don't behave like this. Rather, the interference peaks are of the form (amount of 'stuff' from slit 1) x (amount of 'stuff' from slit 2). This is one of the important effects that the experiment is supposed to show.

The double slit experiment is based on entirely different mathematics to this sand experiment, I'm afraid.
 
  • #4
The problem is that you need a coherent source: it's rather impossible to ensure that that in the case of sand grains.
 
  • #5
masudr said:
The problem is that you need a coherent source: it's rather impossible to ensure that that in the case of sand grains.
I don't think that's the issue here. We do see double slit interference for a thermal light source.

Recalling De Broglie's relation, assuming a sand grain of mass 1mg and demanding a 1/2 mm wavelength (since I'm sceptical that a wavelength below the particle diameter will work), the sand would need a velocity of 10^-24 m/s. To emphasize the problem (via equipartition theorem) you're looking at maintaining 10^-31 K and (to propagate into a diffraction pattern) preventing any interaction for up to 10^14 centuries..

You should look up the research on buckyball interference.
 
  • #6
Buckyballs are indeed the reigning heavy weights in the double slit world. It is already plenty weird anything this big can submit to quantum effects. I think the 'double slit' effects occurs at all scales but is too tiny to be measurable at macroscopic scales. Sort of like trying to weigh an elephant to the nearest .001 gram.
 
  • #7
Chronos said:
Buckyballs are indeed the reigning heavy weights in the double slit world. It is already plenty weird anything this big can submit to quantum effects. I think the 'double slit' effects occurs at all scales but is too tiny to be measurable at macroscopic scales. Sort of like trying to weigh an elephant to the nearest .001 gram.


Or the question they used to get back in the nineteenth century: "Is there diffraction around a chair?".
 

Related to Double slit experiment with macroscopic size objects

What is the double slit experiment with macroscopic size objects?

The double slit experiment is a classic physics experiment that involves sending a beam of particles (such as electrons, photons, or atoms) through two parallel slits and observing the resulting pattern on a screen. This experiment has also been performed with larger objects, such as molecules or even small diamonds, to study the principles of quantum mechanics on a macroscopic scale.

What is the purpose of the double slit experiment with macroscopic size objects?

The purpose of this experiment is to investigate the behavior of macroscopic objects at the quantum level. It allows scientists to study the principles of quantum mechanics, such as wave-particle duality and superposition, on a larger scale and understand how they apply to everyday objects.

What are the results of the double slit experiment with macroscopic size objects?

The results of this experiment show that even macroscopic objects can exhibit wave-like behavior. The pattern observed on the screen is similar to the interference pattern seen in the classic double slit experiment with particles. This supports the idea that all objects, regardless of size, have both particle and wave-like properties.

What are the implications of the double slit experiment with macroscopic size objects?

The implications of this experiment are far-reaching and have important implications for our understanding of the physical world. It challenges our classical, deterministic view of the universe and suggests that the behavior of objects at the quantum level is probabilistic. It also has potential applications in fields such as quantum computing and precision measurement.

What are the current limitations of the double slit experiment with macroscopic size objects?

One of the major limitations of this experiment is that it is difficult to isolate and control all variables, making it challenging to reproduce the results consistently. Additionally, the larger the object used in the experiment, the more difficult it becomes to observe quantum effects. Furthermore, the precise mechanisms behind the behavior of macroscopic objects at the quantum level are still not fully understood.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
854
Replies
5
Views
858
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
49
Views
3K
Replies
60
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
18
Views
1K
Back
Top