Doubt in a step while deriving Bertrand theorem

In summary, the conversation discusses the derivation of Bertrand's Theorem in the Appendix of Goldstein's 2nd edition. The theorem states that for a conservative central force, the solution to the orbit equation can be written as a Fourier sum involving only cosine terms with argument βθ. The author determines this by considering the condition that the right-hand side of equation A-10 is an even function of θ. This is related to the evenness of the solution, which can be seen in the form of J(u) where u(x) and u(-x) are both solutions. Thus, the use of a Fourier expansion with only cosine terms is justified.
  • #1
Kashmir
468
74
Goldstein 2nd ed.

In its Appendix is given the derivation of Bertrands Theorem.
Screenshot_20211029_103327.jpg
Here ##x=u-u_0## is the deviation from circularity and ##J(u)=-\frac{m}{l^{2}} \frac{d}{d u} V\left(\frac{1}{u}\right)=-\frac{m}{l^{2} u^{2}} f\left(\frac{1}{u}\right)##

If the R.H.S of A-10 was zero, the solution was then ##a \cos(β\theta)##. However if there are terms on the RHS as given in equation A-10 the author writes the solution as a Fourier sum involving only cosine terms .
Now how does the author know that we should use a Fourier expansion of ##x## using only cosine terms with argument ##β\theta##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do you have a condition that RHS of A-10 is even function of ##\theta## ?
 
  • #3
anuttarasammyak said:
Do you have a condition that RHS of A-10 is even function of ##\theta## ?
We started from the orbit equation under a conservative central force written as
##
\frac{d^{2} u}{d \theta^{2}}+u=J(u)
##
where
##
J(u)=-\frac{m}{l^{2}} \frac{d}{d u} V\left(\frac{1}{u}\right)=-\frac{m}{l^{2} u^{2}} f\left(\frac{1}{u}\right)
## which i believe if ##u(x)##is its solution then ##u(-x)## is as well.
So maybe the eveness of solution comes from here. I'm not sure.
 

FAQ: Doubt in a step while deriving Bertrand theorem

What is the Bertrand theorem and why is it important in science?

The Bertrand theorem is a mathematical principle that explains the relationship between the stability of an object and the forces acting upon it. It is important in science because it helps us understand the behavior of physical systems and make predictions about their stability.

What is the role of doubt in the process of deriving the Bertrand theorem?

Doubt plays a crucial role in the process of deriving the Bertrand theorem. It allows scientists to critically examine their assumptions and methods, leading to a more accurate and reliable result. Without doubt, the theorem may not have been developed or may have been based on flawed reasoning.

How does one address doubt in the process of deriving the Bertrand theorem?

One way to address doubt in the process of deriving the Bertrand theorem is by using the scientific method. This involves making observations, formulating a hypothesis, testing the hypothesis through experiments, and analyzing the results. Through this process, scientists can identify and address any doubts or uncertainties in their reasoning.

Are there any limitations or assumptions in the Bertrand theorem?

Like any scientific principle, the Bertrand theorem has its limitations and assumptions. For example, it assumes that the object in question is rigid and that the forces acting upon it are constant. It also does not take into account factors such as friction or air resistance. Therefore, it is important to consider these limitations when applying the theorem to real-world situations.

How has the Bertrand theorem been used in scientific research?

The Bertrand theorem has been applied in various fields of science, such as physics, engineering, and biology. It has been used to study the stability of structures, the behavior of fluids, and the movement of celestial bodies. Its applications have also led to the development of new technologies and advancements in our understanding of the natural world.

Similar threads

Back
Top