- #1
brunotolentin.4
- 6
- 0
First doubt: The impedance Z is defined how Z = R + j X and the reactance X can be wrote how:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_reactance
So, by analogy, the admitance Y is defined how Y = G + j B and the susceptance B can be wrote how what? So:
[tex]B = \left( \frac{\omega C}{1} - \frac{1}{\omega L} \right)[/tex]
Or this form:
[tex]B = \left( \frac{1}{\omega L} - \frac{\omega C}{1} \right)[/tex]
?
Help: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuscettanzaSecond doubt: in this page: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistance_and_conductance", the condutance G is defined how the reciprocal of R, BUT, BUT, in this page: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susceptance", the condutance G is defined now how:
[tex]G = \left( \frac{R}{R^2+X^2} \right)[/tex]
So, this last equation is the general definition of G and the first definition is the particular case, when X = 0, correct!?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_reactance
So, by analogy, the admitance Y is defined how Y = G + j B and the susceptance B can be wrote how what? So:
[tex]B = \left( \frac{\omega C}{1} - \frac{1}{\omega L} \right)[/tex]
Or this form:
[tex]B = \left( \frac{1}{\omega L} - \frac{\omega C}{1} \right)[/tex]
?
Help: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuscettanzaSecond doubt: in this page: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistance_and_conductance", the condutance G is defined how the reciprocal of R, BUT, BUT, in this page: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susceptance", the condutance G is defined now how:
[tex]G = \left( \frac{R}{R^2+X^2} \right)[/tex]
So, this last equation is the general definition of G and the first definition is the particular case, when X = 0, correct!?