- #1
dimensionless
- 462
- 1
Driven Damped Harmonic Oscillator, f != ma??
Let's say I've got a driven damped harmonic oscillator described by the following equation:
[tex]A \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = D f(t)[/tex]
given that [tex] f = ma[/tex] why can't I write
[tex]A \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = D ma[/tex]
substitute [tex]\ddot{x} = a[/tex] to get
[tex]A \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = D m \ddot{x}[/tex]
and then rearrange to get
[tex](A - D m) \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = 0[/tex]
I know that's not how the problem is solved, but what is to stop me from solving it that way?
Let's say I've got a driven damped harmonic oscillator described by the following equation:
[tex]A \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = D f(t)[/tex]
given that [tex] f = ma[/tex] why can't I write
[tex]A \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = D ma[/tex]
substitute [tex]\ddot{x} = a[/tex] to get
[tex]A \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = D m \ddot{x}[/tex]
and then rearrange to get
[tex](A - D m) \ddot{x} + B \dot{x} + C x = 0[/tex]
I know that's not how the problem is solved, but what is to stop me from solving it that way?
Last edited: