Dynamic equilibrium - walking in constant speed

In summary, when a person is walking at a constant speed, the net force is zero. The static friction force is present and serves as a resisting force, but there are also internal motive forces, such as moving the legs, that contribute to balancing the center of mass and keeping the person from falling under gravity. The friction force is equal and opposite to the drag force, which is the external force acting on the person.
  • #1
yoni162
16
0

Homework Statement


A man is walking in a straight line in a constant speed V. All variables are known. Since the speed in constant, the net force is zero. But aside from the static friction which is allowing him to move forward, what other force is present (in the direction of the movement), which is supposed to cancel out the friction so that the net forces is zero?

Homework Equations


[tex]\sum[/tex]F = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried comparing it to walking on a treadmill on a constant speed. In this situation, there is no (or isn't supposed to be) static friction, since you're not really pushing yourself forward, only "jumping" while the belt is going backwards, so that you stay at the same position. But when walking on the ground, I have to use friction in order to move forward, so what is the force that is opposite in direction to the static friction that is acting upon me?

If this is supposed to be in "Classical Mechanics" forum, sorry..please move the thread.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
yoni162 said:

Homework Statement


A man is walking in a straight line in a constant speed V. All variables are known. Since the speed in constant, the net force is zero. But aside from the static friction which is allowing him to move forward, what other force is present (in the direction of the movement), which is supposed to cancel out the friction so that the net forces is zero?


Homework Equations


[tex]\sum[/tex]F = 0


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried comparing it to walking on a treadmill on a constant speed. In this situation, there is no (or isn't supposed to be) static friction, since you're not really pushing yourself forward, only "jumping" while the belt is going backwards, so that you stay at the same position. But when walking on the ground, I have to use friction in order to move forward, so what is the force that is opposite in direction to the static friction that is acting upon me?

If this is supposed to be in "Classical Mechanics" forum, sorry..please move the thread.

Welcome to PF.

Walking is a bit like a controlled fall. And the static friction is a resisting force. But there are motive forces, such as moving your legs one in front of the other, even though the legs may serve more to balance the center of mass on top to keep you from falling under gravity as you move.
 
  • #3
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

Walking is a bit like a controlled fall. And the static friction is a resisting force. But there are motive forces, such as moving your legs one in front of the other, even though the legs may serve more to balance the center of mass on top to keep you from falling under gravity as you move.

First thanks for the reply. I think I understand what you're saying, it a situation like this, the friction force has to be a "response" force, as in a force that is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to a force that was applied beforehand. But what is that force? If I want to look at the entire body of the walking man, there is friction acting in opposite direction of movement, but what was the original force that cause the friction force, if I'm looking at the man's entire body as a whole?
 
  • #4
LowlyPion said:
Welcome to PF.

Walking is a bit like a controlled fall. And the static friction is a resisting force. But there are motive forces, such as moving your legs one in front of the other, even though the legs may serve more to balance the center of mass on top to keep you from falling under gravity as you move.

But are not these 'motive forces' simply internal forces - are not only external forces are of concern? I presume that when you are walking at a constant speed there is in fact very little friction force (only enough to be equal and opposite to the drag force).
 
  • #5


In this scenario, the force that is opposing the static friction is the force of air resistance. As the person walks, they are pushing against the air molecules, creating a resistance that must be overcome in order to maintain a constant speed. This force is typically small and can be neglected in many cases, but it is still present and must be considered in a complete analysis of the system. Additionally, the person's own body weight may also provide a small downward force that counteracts the static friction, but this is also typically negligible. Ultimately, in order for the person to maintain a constant speed, the forces of static friction, air resistance, and their own body weight must all be balanced in a dynamic equilibrium.
 

FAQ: Dynamic equilibrium - walking in constant speed

What is dynamic equilibrium?

Dynamic equilibrium refers to the state of balance or stability in a system that is constantly changing or moving. In the context of walking in constant speed, it refers to the balance of forces and movements that allow a person to maintain a steady walking pace.

How does the body maintain dynamic equilibrium while walking?

The body maintains dynamic equilibrium while walking through a combination of sensory input, muscular control, and coordination. The eyes, inner ear, and muscles all play a role in detecting changes in movement and adjusting accordingly to maintain balance and stability.

Can dynamic equilibrium be affected by external factors?

Yes, dynamic equilibrium can be affected by external factors such as uneven terrain, weather conditions, and obstacles in the environment. These factors may require the body to make adjustments in order to maintain balance and stability while walking.

Is dynamic equilibrium the same as static equilibrium?

No, dynamic equilibrium and static equilibrium are two different states of balance. Dynamic equilibrium involves maintaining balance while in motion, while static equilibrium is maintaining balance while at rest.

How can studying dynamic equilibrium in walking benefit other fields of science?

Studying dynamic equilibrium in walking can benefit other fields of science, such as biomechanics and kinesiology. Understanding the balance and movement patterns involved in walking can also inform the development of prosthetics and assistive devices for individuals with mobility impairments.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
613
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
339
Replies
41
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top