Dynamic physical model - automobile wheel suspension confusion

  • #1
shivajikobardan
674
54
Homework Statement
dynamic physical model
Relevant Equations
spring mass system equation, electric circuit equation
Been a long time I studied physics that had anything to do with mechanics, so I'm now in need of memorizing almost everything. So I am seeking for some guidance here. This is "system simulation/modeling/discrete event system simulation/etc" type of subject.

1657552151433.png

1657552164872.png

1657552183049.png


The first thing that I didn't understand is "what point are we trying to make by equating 2 equations" in relation with dynamic physical model?
While i get it that we have analogous equations in real world though.
And I didn't understand how Newton's law of motion was applied to the first figure? And what law is applied in electric circuit in second figure? Coloumb's law? I forgot why are we using derivatives of current L and R but charge q for C?

I know these equations-:

q/C=V

=>V~q

LdI/dt=V
=> V~q**

V=IR
=>V~q*

I guess it is sth like this. But not sure how exactly it was translated (but I think this much information would be enough for this exam for electric circuit part so just help me with physics mechanics part).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
shivajikobardan said:
And I didn't understand how Newton's law of motion was applied to the first figure
Hi,

##F = ma## is the law applied here. ##ma## appears as ##m{d^2x\over dt^2}## and there are three forces that add up to the ##F##. Maybe the fact that they moved over two of them to the other side of the ##=## sign is what confuses you a bit ?

The spring exerts ##F_s = -kx##
The dashpot exerts ##F_d = - D\dot x = -D {dx\over dt}##
And the exernal force is ##F_t##.

The ##K## in front of that in ##(1.1)## is in error. Likewise the ##{1\over C}## in the electric analogon.
(Check the dimensions).

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes shivajikobardan and jack action
  • #3
BvU said:
The ##K## in front of that in ##(1.1)## is in error. Likewise the ##{1\over C}## in the electric analogon.
(Check the dimensions).

##\ ##
Every other book about this is saying the same thing(written in that book) though.
 
  • #4
BvU said:
The dashpot exerts ##F_d = - D\dot x = -D {dx\over dt}
How do you find dashpot force? I didn't get this.
 
  • #5
shivajikobardan said:
Every other book about this is saying the same thing(written in that book) though.
Never seen the spring stiffness associated with the external force before and it doesn't make sense anyway. From Wikipedia:
Deriving the equations of motion for this model is usually done by examining the sum of forces on the mass:

a7595e04d4f8cb59560a2be5f12170a42afb66a4

shivajikobardan said:
How do you find dashpot force? I didn't get this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dashpot said:
A dashpot, also known as a damper, is a mechanical device that resists motion via viscous friction. The resulting force is proportional to the velocity, but acts in the opposite direction, slowing the motion and absorbing energy.
 
  • Like
Likes shivajikobardan
  • #6
jack action said:
Never seen the spring stiffness associated with the external force before and it doesn't make sense anyway. From Wikipedia:
yeah not adding it doesn't make any difference.
 
  • #7
shivajikobardan said:
Homework Statement:: dynamic physical model
Relevant Equations:: spring mass system equation, electric circuit equation

And what law is applied in electric circuit in second figure? Coloumb's law? I forgot why are we using derivatives of current L and R but charge q for C?
That's Kirchoff's Voltage Law which tells us the sum of potential differences around any closed loop is zero. Applying the law we get
$$E(t) - IR - L\frac{dI}{dt} - \frac{q}{C} = 0$$

You can then rephrase ##\frac{dI}{dt}## and ##I## in terms of the derivatives of charge ##q## . Does that clear your doubt?

Although like BvU said, the ##\frac{1}{C}## on the right has to be an error because the units don't add up. Hope this helped.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #8
haider said:
That's Kirchoff's Voltage Law which tells us the sum of potential differences around any closed loop is zero. Applying the law we get
$$E(t) - IR - L\frac{dI}{dt} - \frac{q}{C} = 0$$

You can then rephrase ##\frac{dI}{dt}## and ##I## in terms of the derivatives of charge ##q## . Does that clear your doubt?

Although like BvU said, the ##\frac{1}{C}## on the right has to be an error because the units don't add up. Hope this helped.
oh yeah KVL, thanks for the info. this helps for electric circuit doubt.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and haider

Similar threads

Replies
102
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
737
Replies
42
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top