E-field for a rectangle of charge

In summary: Well, I can't see anything obviously wrong … but I still think you should substitute …x = tan^-1(l/h)then dl = h/(h² + l²) dxand √(h² + l²) = h secxand √(w² + 4) = √(h² + l²) cosxso w = √(h² + l²)sinxand √(w² + 4) = √(h² + l²) cosxand dw = √(h² + l²) cosx dxdE=\frac{2hkw\sigma}{(h^2+L^
  • #1
Xelotath
3
0
The Problem is finding the E-field at a point P that is h distance from the center of a rectangle (along a line normal to its surface) with Length L and width W with a constant charge density sigma.

This is for an intro E&M class that is supposed to use up through calculus 2, and we have not yet discussed Gausses Law. So supposedly this should be able to be solved without any double or triple integration. Since I have had vector calculus I should be able to understand any help using vector calculus techniques.

Here is what I have tried so far and where I have gotten stuck.

Attached is an image of the problem.
Just in case the image doesn't work, I have set it up so that:

Theta is the angle on the surface between a point along the width at the center and point P.
Phi is the angle on the surface between a point along the length at the center and point P.

I started by saying:
dE=kdqsin(theta)sin(phi)/r^2
But dq=sigmadA and r=sqrt(W^2+L^2+h^2) and sin (theta)=h/sqrt(W^2+h^2) and sin(phi)=h/sqrt(L^2+h^2)
Thus dE=ksigmah^2dwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2)sqrt[(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)]]

From this point I have tried lots of algebraic stuff to make it easier to integrate, but I just have not been able to integrate this at all, and I am not sure if it is possible to do so. I am worried that my set up may be wrong. Any help would be much appreciated. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-2.jpg
    Untitled-2.jpg
    50.1 KB · Views: 387
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF!

Xelotath said:
dE=kdqsin(theta)sin(phi)/r^2
But dq=sigmadA and r=sqrt(W^2+L^2+h^2) and sin (theta)=h/sqrt(W^2+h^2) and sin(phi)=h/sqrt(L^2+h^2)
Thus dE=ksigmah^2dwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2)sqrt[(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)]]

Hi Xelotath! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and a squared: ² and a theta: θ and a phi: φ :smile:)

I'm finding it difficult to read what you've done … :confused:

i'm not convinced of the merits of spherical coordinates if the plate isn't a disc …

can I check … you are calculating only the component perpendicular to the rectangle? :smile:
 
  • #3
Yes I am using the symmetry argument to say that the resultant E-field is only in the direction normal to the surface of the rectangle at point P, as all the other directions cancel out.

I am not using a spherical reference coordinate system. The sin(theta) and sin(phi) are to find the component of dE in the direction normal to the rectangle.

Sorry about the mess I don't know how to use these forum tools properly yet.
I think I've fixed it here.

dE=[tex]\frac{kdqsin(\theta)sin(\phi)}{r^{2}}[/tex]

but dq=[tex]\sigma[/tex]dA and r=[tex]\sqrt{(W^2+L^2+h^2)}[/tex] and sin([tex]\theta[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{W^2+h^2}}[/tex] and sin([tex]\phi[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{L^2+h^2}}[/tex]

Thus dE=[tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]h^{2}[/tex]kdwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2) [tex]\sqrt{(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)}[/tex]]

Sorry I keep trying to get that last line into a fraction using the tools, but it won't seem to work.
 
  • #4
Xelotath said:
I am not using a spherical reference coordinate system. The sin(theta) and sin(phi) are to find the component of dE in the direction normal to the rectangle.

dE=[tex]\frac{kdqsin(\theta)sin(\phi)}{r^{2}}[/tex]

but dq=[tex]\sigma[/tex]dA and r=[tex]\sqrt{(W^2+L^2+h^2)}[/tex] and sin([tex]\theta[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{W^2+h^2}}[/tex] and sin([tex]\phi[/tex])=[tex]\frac{h}{\sqrt{L^2+h^2}}[/tex]

Thus dE=[tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]h^{2}[/tex]kdwdl/[(L^2+W^2+h^2) [tex]\sqrt{(h^2+L^2)(W^2+h^2)}[/tex]]

Sorry I keep trying to get that last line into a fraction using the tools, but it won't seem to work.

(to do fractions, type \frac{}{} :wink:)

ah! that's much easier to read! :smile:

surely your cos for the component should just be h/√(h² + w² + l²) ?
 
  • #5
So I have:
E=[tex]\int\int \frac{k\sigma h}{(L^2+W^2+h^2)^\frac{3}{2}}dwdl[/tex]
after the inner integration with bounds -w/2 to w/2 I get
E=[tex]\int \frac{2hkw\sigma}{(h^2+L^2)^\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{w^2+4}}dl[/tex]

Thus E=[tex]\frac{2kwL\sigma}{h\sqrt{(w^2+4)(L^2+h^2}}[/tex]
This still seems wrong
Because by calculations performed myself and seen in my textbook when you take the limit as both W and L approach infinite then E should go to [tex]2k\sigma[/tex] but here it is going to [tex]\frac{2k\sigma}{h}[/tex]
Any ideas? Or can you tell me if I've made some mistake.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Hi Xelotath! :smile:
Xelotath said:
E=[tex]\int \frac{2hkw\sigma}{(h^2+L^2)^\frac{3}{2}\sqrt{w^2+4}}dl[/tex]

No … dimensionally that's wrong …

how did you get it? the obvious thing is to substitute w = √(h2 + l2)sinhx or √(h2 + l2)tanx. :smile:
 

FAQ: E-field for a rectangle of charge

What is an E-field for a rectangle of charge?

The E-field for a rectangle of charge refers to the electric field that is produced by a rectangle-shaped distribution of electric charge.

How is the E-field calculated for a rectangle of charge?

The E-field for a rectangle of charge can be calculated by using Coulomb's Law, which states that the electric field at a point is equal to the force between two point charges divided by the distance between them squared.

What factors affect the magnitude and direction of the E-field for a rectangle of charge?

The magnitude and direction of the E-field for a rectangle of charge are affected by the amount and distribution of charge within the rectangle, as well as the distance from the point in question to the rectangle.

What are some real-life applications of the E-field for a rectangle of charge?

The E-field for a rectangle of charge has many practical applications, such as in the design of electronic devices, the functioning of capacitors, and the understanding of electric fields in materials.

How does the E-field for a rectangle of charge differ from that of other shapes?

The E-field for a rectangle of charge differs from other shapes in terms of its symmetry and the way the electric field lines are distributed. Rectangles have a more uniform distribution of field lines compared to other shapes, such as spheres or cylinders.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
544
Replies
12
Views
755
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
310
Back
Top