Easy Implicit Differentiation Question

In summary, The question provides an equation for y in terms of x and requires finding the normal component of acceleration at a given point. The solution involves implicit differentiation to find the derivatives of x and y, and then using the known values to find the unknowns. The final step is to find a unit vector parallel to the velocity and use the dot product to find the normal component of acceleration.
  • #1
steven10137
118
0

Homework Statement


[tex]y^2 = 3x^3 + 2x[/tex] and y must be positive.
Find the normal component of acceleration when:
[tex]x=3m[/tex]
[tex]\dot x = 5ms^{ - 1}[/tex]
[tex]\ddot x = 5ms^{ - 2} [/tex]

2. The attempt at a solution
Well my approach would be to differentiate it implicitly twice and solve for [tex]{\ddot y}[/tex].
Then I have the x and y components of acceleration, not sure how I would find the normal acceleration from here. But here goes anyways:

[tex]2y.\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} = 9x^2 .\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} + 2.\frac{{dx}}{{dt}}[/tex]

Now I looked at this and thought ... "how the hell am I going to differentiate that", then I though I could perhaps use the product rule:

[tex]2.\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} + 2y.\frac{{d^2 y}}{{dt^2 }} = 18x.\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} + 9x^2 .\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }} + 2.\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }}[/tex]

Now I can chuck in my known values and solve for [tex]{\ddot y}[/tex].

[tex]
\begin{array}{l}
2y.\frac{{d^2 y}}{{dt^2 }} = \left( {9x^2 + 2} \right)\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }} + 18x.\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} - 2.\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} \\
\frac{{d^2 y}}{{dt^2 }} = \frac{{\left( {9x^2 + 2} \right)\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }} + 18x.\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} - 2.\frac{{dy}}{{dt}}}}{{2y}} \\
\end{array}
[/tex]

The answer I get for [tex]{\ddot y}[/tex] is ~32.9

Any ideas where to go from here?
Cheers
Steven
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's odd that you are given how y is a function of x, but not how either x,y are functions of t. Maybe I'm not interpreting the question properly but what I'll do is to first find a position vector r(t) and then apply the formula to find the normal component of acceleration.
 
  • #3
Thanks for your reply.

Yeah the question does seem a little odd.
So you would find a position vector from the given equation in terms of y and x?
not sure what you mean here...
 
  • #4
Did you post the question exactly as where you read it? Some important information might have been omitted. I would like to assume that we could take x=t as the free variable, but in this case t is given a physical interpretation and it wouldn't be justified if this assumption is made without more info.
 
  • #5
OK, here is the exact question:

Given [tex]y^2 = 3x^3 + 2x[/tex] where x and y are in metres and y is positive,
what is the normal component of the acceleration when:

[tex]x=3m[/tex]

[tex]\dot x=5m[/tex]

[tex]\ddot x=5m[/tex]
 
  • #6
steven10137 said:
OK, here is the exact question:

Given [tex]y^2 = 3x^3 + 2x[/tex] where x and y are in metres and y is positive,
what is the normal component of the acceleration when:

[tex]x=3m[/tex]

[tex]\dot x=5m[/tex]

[tex]\ddot x=5m[/tex]

If you look at that equation and it's first and second derivative with respect to t, that's three equations in the six unknowns x,x',x'',y,y',y''. The problem statement gives you values for three of them. You should be able to find the other three. Then you know everything.
 
  • #7
Thanks for your reply.

OK, so I also have:
[tex]y = + \sqrt {3x^3 + 2x} = \sqrt {3\left( 3 \right)^3 + 2\left( 3 \right)} = \sqrt {87}
[/tex]
thats 4/6 unknowns found.

I need to find the derivate with respect to time, how should I approach this?
Implicit Differentiation - I tried this but got a bit stuck.

[tex]\begin{array}{l}
2y.\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} = 9x^2 .\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} + 2.\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} \\
\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} = \frac{{\frac{{dx}}{{dt}}\left[ {9x^2 + 2} \right]}}{{2y}} = \frac{{5\left[ {9\left( 3 \right)^2 + 2} \right]}}{{2\sqrt {87} }} = \frac{{415}}{{2\sqrt {87} }} \approx 22.246\;ms^{ - 1} \\
\end{array}[/tex]

Correct?

Now I'm stuck with the second derivative.
 
  • #8
That looks fine. For the second derivative you've got the right idea to use the product rule, but you haven't quite got everything right. Take y^2. The first derivative is 2*y*y'. The second derivative is 2*y'*y'+2*y*y''. Compare that with your left side.
 
  • #9
OK thanks, how about:

[tex]\begin{array}{l}
2.\frac{{dy}}{{dt}}.\frac{{dy}}{{dt}} + 2y.\frac{{d^2 y}}{{dt^2 }} = 18x.\frac{{dx}}{{dt}}.\frac{{dx}}{{dt}} + 9x^2 .\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }} + 2.\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }} \\
2y.\frac{{d^2 y}}{{dt^2 }} = \frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }}\left[ {9x^2 + 2} \right] + 18x.\left( {\frac{{dx}}{{dt}}} \right)^2 - 2.\left( {\frac{{dy}}{{dt}}} \right)^2 \\
\frac{{d^2 y}}{{dt^2 }} = \frac{{\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }}\left[ {9x^2 + 2} \right] + 18x.\left[ {\frac{{dx}}{{dt}}} \right]^2 - 2.\left[ {\frac{{dy}}{{dt}}} \right]^2 }}{{2y}} = \frac{{5\left[ {9\left( 3 \right)^2 + 2} \right] + 18\left( 3 \right) \times \left[ 5 \right]^2 - 2\left[ {\frac{{415}}{{2\sqrt {87} }}} \right]^2 }}{{2\sqrt {87} }} \approx 41.55\;ms^{ - 2} \\
\end{array}[/tex]

So I know have all of my unknowns and need to find the normal component of acceleration.
I have my 2 components of acceleration in x/y form, how can I go about converting this to a normal/tangential form?
I guess I can find the magnitude and direction of the total acceleration using simple trig, but where to from here?
 
  • #10
I'll trust you on the arithmetic for that one. The normal component of acceleration (a) is the part that's perpendicular to the velocity (v). So find a unit vector parallel to v and split a into normal and parallel parts relative to that direction.
 
  • #11
Dick said:
I'll trust you on the arithmetic for that one.

lol :P

So find a unit vector parallel to v and split a into normal and parallel parts relative to that direction.

OK, so the velocity is:
[tex]\begin{array}{l}
\left| v \right| = \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{dy}}{{dt}}} \right)^2 + \left( {\frac{{dx}}{{dt}}} \right)^2 } = \sqrt {\left( {\frac{{415}}{{2\sqrt {87} }}} \right)^2 + \left( 5 \right)^2 } \approx 22.80\;ms^{ - 1} \\
\tan \theta = \frac{{dy/dt}}{{dx/dt}} = \frac{{\left( {\frac{{415}}{{2\sqrt {87} }}} \right)}}{5} = 4.45 \Rightarrow \theta = 77.33^ \circ \\
\end{array}[/tex]

The normal acceleration is perpendicular to the velocity, so we can make a right angled triangle as such:
[tex]
\begin{array}{l}
\tan \theta = \frac{{a_n }}{{\left| v \right|}} \Rightarrow a_n = \left| v \right|.\tan \theta \\
a_n = 22.80 \times 4.45 = 101.45\;ms^{ - 2} \\
\end{array}[/tex]

Is this what you mean here?
- The answer seems wayy to high...
 
  • #12
No. That's not it. It's easier if you use vectors. As I said, find a unit vector along the same direction as the velocity. Rotate it 90 degrees and find the dot product with the acceleration vector. Have you done that sort of thing before?
 
  • #13
OK ta

No I haven't done dot products in this sense before.
I now realize the second part of my above working is a bit stupid...

OK so converting the velocity into vector form:
[tex]\left\langle {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
{22.8\cos 77.33} \\
{22.8\sin 77.33} \\
\end{array}} \right\rangle = \left\langle {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
5 \\
{22.246} \\
\end{array}} \right\rangle[/tex]

I must admit I am a little lost now :(
 
  • #14
You don't really have to convert to vector form. v=(5,22.246), a=(5,41.55). They were already in vector form. What I would do is write down the unit vector u=v/|v|. Then a.u (dot product) is the component of acceleration parallel to v. That would mean the perpendicular component is sqrt(|a|^2-(u.v)^2). Or I would rotate u 90 degrees and get the component straight from the dot product. If you aren't comfortable with this, you could just keep going with your previous approach. Find |a| and an angle for the acceleration as well and do some trig.
 
  • #15
Of course, yes they were already .. argh I'm complicating it even more.

I would prefer to use the latter method as it makes more sense to me:
[tex]
\begin{array}{l}
\tan \alpha = \frac{{d^2 y/dt^2 }}{{d^2 x/dt^2 }} = \frac{{41.55}}{5} = 8.31 \Rightarrow \alpha = 83.14^ \circ \\
\left| a \right| = \sqrt {\left[ {\frac{{d^2 y}}{{dt^2 }}} \right]^2 + \left[ {\frac{{d^2 x}}{{dt^2 }}} \right]^2 } = \sqrt {41.55^2 + 5^2 } = 41.85\;ms^{ - 2} \\
\end{array}
[/tex]

Dick said:
...and do some trig.

I think I am getting on the right track now; here is a diagram I made:
http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/9264/normalaccelerationln8.jpg

So I am trying to find the component of acceleration, parallel to the velocity vector.
Should be:
[tex]\begin{array}{l}
\alpha - \theta = 5.806^ \circ \Rightarrow \cos \left( {\alpha - \theta } \right) = \frac{{component\;of\;acceleration\;parallel\;to\;velocity}}{{\left| a \right|}} \\
\Rightarrow component\;of\;acceleration\;parallel\;to\;velocity = \left| a \right|\cos \left( {\alpha - \theta } \right) = 41.64\;ms^{ - 2} \\
\end{array}
[/tex]

Look ok?
Now I am looking for the perpendicular vector to this component I just found?

[tex]\tan \theta = \frac{{a_n }}{{component\;of\;acceleration\;parallel\;to\;velocity}} \Rightarrow a_n = 185.27\;ms^{ - 2}
[/tex]

Still seems too high though :(

Thanks once again for your help, this has turned into a bit of a slog.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
You've got the parallel part right. p=41.64m/s^2. You want to find the normal part n. |a|^2=|p|^2+|n|^2, right?
 
  • #17
[tex]\begin{array}{l}
\left| a \right| = \sqrt {a_n ^2 + a_t ^2 } \\
\Rightarrow \left| {a_n } \right| = \sqrt {\left| a \right|^2 - \left| {a_t } \right|^2 } = \sqrt {41.85^2 - 41.64^2 } = 4.23\;ms^{ - 2} \\
\end{array}[/tex]

Ahhhhhhh thanks so much mate, makes sense now :)
 

FAQ: Easy Implicit Differentiation Question

What is implicit differentiation?

Implicit differentiation is a method used in calculus to find the derivative of a function where the independent variable is not explicitly stated. This means that the function is not written in the form y = f(x), but rather in a more complex form such as x^2 + y^2 = 25.

How is implicit differentiation different from explicit differentiation?

In explicit differentiation, the function is written in the form y = f(x) and the independent variable is clearly stated. The derivative can then be found by applying the power rule, product rule, quotient rule, or chain rule. In implicit differentiation, the function is not written in this form, so the rules for explicit differentiation cannot be directly applied.

What are the steps for solving an easy implicit differentiation question?

The steps for solving an easy implicit differentiation question are as follows:
1. Differentiate both sides of the equation with respect to the independent variable.
2. Use the chain rule if necessary.
3. Isolate the derivative of y by moving all terms containing y to one side of the equation.
4. Simplify the resulting expression to find the derivative of y.

Why is implicit differentiation useful?

Implicit differentiation allows us to find the derivative of a function even when it is not written in a simple form. This technique can be applied to many real-world problems, such as finding the rate of change in a physics problem or determining the slope of a curve on a graph.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when using implicit differentiation?

Some common mistakes to avoid when using implicit differentiation include:
- Forgetting to use the chain rule when necessary
- Making algebraic errors when isolating the derivative of y
- Forgetting to take the derivative of the independent variable (e.g. d/dx)
- Not simplifying the resulting expression

Back
Top