MHB Echo62's question at Yahoo Answers (Improper integral)

AI Thread Summary
To evaluate the improper integral of dx/(x^(2/3)) from -3 to 3, it is crucial to recognize the discontinuity at x=0. The integral can be split into two parts: from -3 to 0 and from 0 to 3. The calculation shows that both integrals are equal, leading to a total value of 6√3 for the entire integral. Proper limits must be applied to handle the discontinuity at zero. The final result confirms that the integral converges to 6√3.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

How do I evaluate the integral dx/(x^(2/3)) from -3 to 3?

What I did was, so for the integrand f(x)=1/(x^(2/3)) it's only continuous from (0, infinity), it's discontinuous at x=0, so I set up the integral as the limit as b approaches 0 from the right of the same integrand, so my answer was 3*(3)^(1/3) but that's wrong. Please help me?

Here is a link to the question:

Improper integral help? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello echo62,

We have $$\begin{aligned}
\int_0^3\frac{dx}{x^{2/3}}&=\int_0^3x^{-2/3}dx\\&=\lim_{\epsilon \to 0^+}\int_{\epsilon}^3x^{-2/3}dx\\&=\lim_{\epsilon \to 0^+}\left[3x^{1/3}\right]_{\epsilon}^3\\&=3\lim_{\epsilon \to 0^+}(\sqrt [3]{3}-\sqrt [3]{\epsilon})\\&=3\sqrt [3]{3}\end{aligned}$$ On the other hand, using the transformation $x=-t$:
$$\begin{aligned}\int_{-3}^0\frac{dx}{x^{2/3}}&=\int_{3}^0\frac{-dt}{(-t)^{2/3}}\\&=\int_{0}^3\frac{dt}{t^{2/3}}\\&=\int_{0}^3\frac{dx}{x^{2/3}}
\end{aligned}$$ So, $$\int_{-3}^3\frac{dx}{x^{2/3}}=\int_{-3}^0\frac{dx}{x^{2/3}}+\int_0^3\frac{dx}{x^{2/3}}=2\int_0^3\frac{dx}{x^{2/3}}=\boxed{\;6\sqrt [3]{3}\;}$$
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top