Eigenstates/values of jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian

  • Thread starter Millertron
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Hamiltonian
In summary, the JCM Hamiltonian with a non-resonant case was solved by applying it to the states |g,n> and |e,n-1> and finding the matrix elements. The eigenvalues were then found by solving det(H-Iλ) = 0 and the eigenvectors were calculated by plugging in the eigenvalues and finding a vector that gives zero when the Hamiltonian is applied to it. Alternatively, a rotation matrix can be used to find the angle that makes the off-diagonal terms zero and the matrix P can be written as a rotation matrix.
  • #1
Millertron
4
0

Homework Statement



The JCM has the Hamiltonian:

[itex] \hat{H} = \hbar \omega \left(\hat{a}\hat{a}^{*} + 1/2 \right) + \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}\hat{\sigma}_{z}}{2} + \hbar g (\hat{\sigma}_{+}\hat{a} + \hat{\sigma}_{-}\hat{a}^{*} [/itex]

Find the eigenstates and energy eigenvalues in this non-resonant case assuming n excitations in the system.

The Attempt at a Solution



I initially thought this would be fairly simple (and I'm sure it is...). Firstly, I applied the Hamiltonian to the states |g,n> and |e,n-1>:

[itex]\hat{H} \left|g,n\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n+1/2) \left|g,n\right\rangle - \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2} \left|g,n\right\rangle + \hbar g \sqrt{n} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle [/itex]

[itex]\hat{H} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n-1/2) \left|e,n-1\right\rangle + \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle + \hbar g \sqrt{n} \left|g,n\right\rangle [/itex]

I also found the matrix elements

[itex]\left\langle g,n \right| \hat{H} \left|g,n\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n+1/2) - \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2}[/itex]

[itex]\left\langle e,n-1 \right| \hat{H} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle = \hbar\omega(n-1/2) + \frac{\hbar\omega_{0}}{2}[/itex]

[itex]\left\langle e,n-1 \right| \hat{H} \left|g,n\right\rangle = \hbar g \sqrt{n}[/itex]

[itex]\left\langle g,n \right| \hat{H} \left|e,n-1\right\rangle = \hbar g \sqrt{n}[/itex]

Here's where I start to get lost. I put the matrix elements into a matrix, and then my natural reaction would be to get the eigenvalues via det(H-Iλ) = 0. I think I need to diagonalise the matrix, only I'm very rusty at this... Find the eigenvalues, then put them into a 2x2 diagonal matrix? Also, I was told I may want to use the rotation matrix:

[itex]\left(\stackrel{cos(\theta)}{-sin(\theta)} \stackrel{sin(\theta)}{cos(\theta)} \right)[/itex]

Which, to be honest, has just confused me... (Also how do I put a matrix into latek?!)

I know I'm looking for the dressed states |± n>, and I know these are related to the eigenvalues (obviously...). Argh. I know I'm close but can't quite think of the last few steps!

Any help would be VERY much appreciated! Assignment due in the near future and I'm in dire need of sleep...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hm, it's been a while since I solved any JC Hamiltonian problems, but I'll try to help out.

To diagonalize a 2x2 matrix by the method you suggest, calculating the values for which ##\mbox{det}(H-\lambda I) = 0##, you just need to remember that the determinant of a 2x2 determinant is

$$\left|\begin{array}{c c}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right| = ad-bc.$$

Applying this to your 2x2 matrix will give you a quadratic polynomial in ##\lambda## to solve for. Then, to find the eigenvectors, you plug each of the eigenvalues back into ##H-\lambda I## and find a vector which gives zero when you apply ##H-\lambda I## to it.

You can then diagonalize the hamiltonian as ## H = P^{-1} D P##, where D is a diagonal matrix with the eigenvalues on the diagonal and P is a matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors you just calculated. (The order of the columns corresponds to the order of the eigenvalues in the columns in D).

The suggestion to use a rotation matrix comes in as a shortcut for some of the above: you know that your eigenvalues in the 2d space will be linear combinations of ##|g,n\rangle## and ##|e,n-1\rangle##; you can parametrize the eigenvectors as

$$|\psi_1\rangle = \cos \theta |g,n\rangle + \sin\theta |e,n-1\rangle \\ |\psi_2\rangle = \cos \theta |g,n\rangle - \sin\theta |e,n-1\rangle.$$

You chose the angle ##\theta## by calculating the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian in this basis and choosing the angle such that the off-diagonal terms are zero.

This will ultimately get you the same result as the other diagonalization procedure, except that here you can skip the finding the eigenvalues and you can probably find the eigenvectors more quickly. Basically, you'll find that the matrix P in the first method can be written as a rotation matrix.

To write a matrix using LaTeX, I write

Code:
\left(\begin{array}{c c}a & b \\ c & d\end{array}\right)
 

FAQ: Eigenstates/values of jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian

What is the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian?

The Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian is a mathematical operator used to describe the interaction between a two-level atom and a quantized electromagnetic field. It is widely used in quantum optics and quantum information theory.

What are eigenstates and eigenvalues?

In quantum mechanics, eigenstates are states of a system that are unaffected by a particular operator. Eigenvalues are the corresponding values that are obtained when the operator acts on the eigenstates. In the context of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, eigenstates represent the energy levels of the system and eigenvalues represent the associated energies.

How are eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian calculated?

The eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian can be calculated using various mathematical techniques, such as diagonalization or perturbation theory. These calculations involve solving the Schrödinger equation for the system and finding the eigenstates and eigenvalues that satisfy the equation.

What is the significance of the eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian?

The eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian provide important information about the energy levels and dynamics of the system. They can be used to predict the behavior of the system under different conditions and to design experiments for studying the system.

How do the eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian change with different parameters?

The eigenstates and eigenvalues of the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian are dependent on the parameters of the system, such as the coupling strength between the atom and the field, the detuning, and the initial state of the system. Changing these parameters can result in different energy levels and dynamics, which can be observed through changes in the eigenstates and eigenvalues.

Back
Top