- #1
maxmaxus
- 6
- 0
As many of you have already guessed I refer to Einstein and his famous quote that the only way to win at roulette will be to steal money from the casino...obviously meaning that you can't devise a mathematical strategy to beat roulette. Over the years of course some people have tried to beat the game while "cheating", that is using machanical devices, but no mathematical strategy is know to beat roulette - and i can confirm that...you can't win in the long term in the so called "fair game"(0 expected value) let alone in a game with negative expectation - such as the roulette. According to money management formulas, like the kelly criterion you shouldn't obviously even try to enter in such game, I've studied potental usage of the parrondo paradox whereas playing a sequence of losing games turn into a winning game...but the trick there is that you actually play 3 games one of which must have a positive expectation and the overall play reduces your mean - so you should only play the winning game in order to be profitable. Finally, i have used the heuristic approach and wrote myself programs in php,c#, etc. to try and test different strategies for fair and negative games and none of them "gained" money after thousands "bets".
Now...what this has to do with relativity?
Answer: It's a very well known fact that one can literally time travel due to time dilation, but up until the last decade or so time travel to the past was nearly a fairytale...not even a science fiction, despite the ideas of warp drives dating back to the 30s. So, as you have guessed already, the winning strategy will be to go to the future -> see the outcome and then go back and place the bet. So, why is this still a hypothetical winning strategy? Because it's almost a dogma these days to think that in order to create a time travel to the past, one would need an exotic matter and the possibility of existence of such matter will be relatively as big as solving for example the baryon assymetry problem - that is...some forces work better for matter, some regions of space have more antimatter...or both - but still these explanations aren't complete because we don't have empirical evidence - so it won't be too bold to claim that no physical theory is complete without an experimental evidence, but this is a modus operandi in physics rather than an absolute truth. Exotic matter should and will be found.
Perhaps in the next 100 years time machine will most likely be build, the challenge is whether the people who build it will share the invention or keep the gold formula just for their own pleasure?
10x...and discuss...i could write more later...
Now...what this has to do with relativity?
Answer: It's a very well known fact that one can literally time travel due to time dilation, but up until the last decade or so time travel to the past was nearly a fairytale...not even a science fiction, despite the ideas of warp drives dating back to the 30s. So, as you have guessed already, the winning strategy will be to go to the future -> see the outcome and then go back and place the bet. So, why is this still a hypothetical winning strategy? Because it's almost a dogma these days to think that in order to create a time travel to the past, one would need an exotic matter and the possibility of existence of such matter will be relatively as big as solving for example the baryon assymetry problem - that is...some forces work better for matter, some regions of space have more antimatter...or both - but still these explanations aren't complete because we don't have empirical evidence - so it won't be too bold to claim that no physical theory is complete without an experimental evidence, but this is a modus operandi in physics rather than an absolute truth. Exotic matter should and will be found.
Perhaps in the next 100 years time machine will most likely be build, the challenge is whether the people who build it will share the invention or keep the gold formula just for their own pleasure?
10x...and discuss...i could write more later...