Einstein's Gravity Model: Explaining Its Creation

In summary, the rubber sheet does not accurately model how gravity works because it does not take into account the time dimension.
  • #1
Android17
11
0
When we do the stretched rubbers he etc analogy of gravitational well, there are two differences 1) the ball moves into depression because of gravity of the earth.
2) stretched rubbersheet is physical and prevents ball from falling down while space would allow you to move anywhere as space doesn't apply a force on you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Android17 said:
the stretched rubbers he etc analogy of gravitational well

Is not a very good analogy because it leaves out the crucial time dimension. For objects moving at slow speeds relative to the massive object that is the source of gravity, the ordinary effects of gravity are best understood as affecting time, not space.
 
  • Like
Likes Sorcerer and Dale
  • #3
Android17 said:
When we do the stretched rubbers
This is an analogy. The truth is ##G^{\mu\nu}=8\pi T^{\mu\nu}## and does not have those shortcomings, but it's difficult to make pretty graphics out of that.
 
  • Like
Likes Sorcerer and Dale
  • #4
Android17 said:
When we do the stretched rubbers he etc analogy of gravitational well,..
It's an analogy of a potential well, not of curved space-time in GR. Try this one instead:

 
  • Like
Likes Android17 and Dale
  • #5
There is a third interpretation. As for a circle draw on rubber around the depression due to massive body, its periphecy is smaller than 2 pi *(radius on rubber sheet) . Geometry changed to Non-Euclid.
 
  • #6
sweet springs said:
There is a third interpretation. As for a circle draw on rubber around the depression due to massive body, its periphecy is smaller than 2 pi *(radius on rubber sheet) . Geometry changed to Non-Euclid.
That is still just describing the spatial geometry, and doesn't explain gravity for which the time dimension is key.
 
  • Like
Likes sweet springs
  • #7
Thanks. Schwartschild metric suggests that inverse of rubber stretch corresponds to time dilation, so... No, I will stop further analogy on rubber toy now.
 
  • #8
sweet springs said:
Schwartschild metric suggests that inverse of rubber stretch corresponds to time dilation...
If the rubber sheet represents the potential well (as it can for Newtonian gravity too). But the sheet has no time dimension to show how space-time geometry creates gravity.
 
  • Like
Likes sweet springs
  • #9
Android17 said:
When we do the stretched rubbers he etc analogy of gravitational well, there are two differences 1) the ball moves into depression because of gravity of the earth.
2) stretched rubbersheet is physical and prevents ball from falling down while space would allow you to move anywhere as space doesn't apply a force on you.

That's quite a good analysis of why the rubber sheet is a poor analogy of curved spacetime!
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix

FAQ: Einstein's Gravity Model: Explaining Its Creation

What is Einstein's Gravity Model?

Einstein's Gravity Model is a theory of gravity developed by Albert Einstein in the early 20th century. It describes gravity as the curvature of space and time caused by the presence of mass and energy. This model revolutionized our understanding of gravity and has been confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.

How did Einstein create the Gravity Model?

Einstein's Gravity Model was created through a series of thought experiments and mathematical equations. He was inspired by the work of physicists before him, including Isaac Newton, but also introduced new concepts such as the equivalence principle and the role of spacetime in gravity. Over the course of several years, Einstein refined and developed his theory, which eventually became known as the General Theory of Relativity.

What evidence supports Einstein's Gravity Model?

There is a lot of evidence that supports Einstein's Gravity Model, including the bending of light by massive objects, the precession of Mercury's orbit, and the gravitational redshift. Additionally, the model has successfully predicted and explained various observations, such as the expansion of the universe and the existence of black holes.

How does Einstein's Gravity Model differ from Newton's theory of gravity?

Einstein's Gravity Model differs from Newton's theory of gravity in several ways. Unlike Newton, Einstein saw gravity as a result of the curvature of spacetime rather than a force between masses. Additionally, Einstein's model takes into account the effects of extreme gravity, such as those near black holes, while Newton's theory is only applicable in weak gravity situations.

Are there any limitations or criticisms of Einstein's Gravity Model?

While Einstein's Gravity Model has been incredibly successful in explaining and predicting many phenomena, it is not without limitations and criticisms. Some scientists have pointed out that the model does not fully incorporate quantum mechanics, and therefore, may not be a complete theory of gravity. Additionally, there have been ongoing debates about the validity of certain assumptions and mathematical concepts used in the model.

Back
Top