MHB Elasticity of Demand problem help

  • Thread starter Thread starter hallie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elasticity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the elasticity of demand using the price-demand equation x=f(p)=20,000-550p. The user struggles with simplifying the elasticity formula E(p)=pf'(p)/f(p) and seeks clarification on reaching the final answer E(p)=11p/(400-11p). Another participant explains that dividing both the numerator and denominator by -50 simplifies the equation while reducing the number of negative signs. The conversation emphasizes the preference for a cleaner mathematical expression and concludes with appreciation for the explanation provided.
hallie
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I know this may seem like a dumb question, but I just can't seem to get by one part of each elasticity of demand problem I come across. For example:

Use the​ price-demand equation below to find​ E(p), the elasticity of demand.
x=f(p)=20,000-550p

I know that E(p)=pf'(p)/f(p), so in this problem that would get me E(p)=p(-550)/20,000-550p, but after that, I am unsure of how to divide the equation in order to simplify it.
I know the answer is E(p)=11p-/400-11p, but if anyone could tell me how to divide/simplify the equation in order to get to that answer, I would be extremely grateful.

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, it looks like you have derived:

$$E(p)=\frac{-550p}{20000-550p}$$

Now if we divide the numerator and denominator by -50, we obtain:

$$E(p)=\frac{11p}{11p-400}$$

Does this make sense?
 
Where do you get the -50 from?
 
hallie said:
Where do you get the -50 from?

Since there is a minus sign on one of the terms in the denominator and a minus sign on the numerator, if we divide by a negative number, then we will only have 1 minus sign in the denominator. I prefer the form:

$$\frac{a}{b-c}$$

over:

$$\frac{-a}{c-b}$$

Even though they are equivalent, I like fewer negatives. Then if we look at 550 and 20000, we see that 50 is the GCD, so dividing each term by -50 will result in the simplest terms in the form with fewer negative signs. :)
 
MarkFL said:
Since there is a minus sign on one of the terms in the denominator and a minus sign on the numerator, if we divide by a negative number, then we will only have 1 minus sign in the denominator. I prefer the form:

$$\frac{a}{b-c}$$

over:

$$\frac{-a}{c-b}$$

Even though they are equivalent, I like fewer negatives. Then if we look at 550 and 20000, we see that 50 is the GCD, so dividing each term by -50 will result in the simplest terms in the form with fewer negative signs. :)

Perfect! Thank you so much for this explanation! :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top