A Electric and magnetic field lines in a plane wave of finite extent

AI Thread Summary
In an infinite plane wave propagating in the z direction, the momentum density points in the z direction, resulting in zero angular momentum density about the z-axis. Even circularly polarized waves, which are composed of linearly polarized waves, do not exert torque on charged matter due to the absence of z-angular momentum density. However, when considering a plane wave of finite transverse extent, the electric and magnetic fields can develop a z-component in the region near the wave's boundary, leading to transverse energy flux. This transverse energy flow allows circularly polarized waves to transport angular momentum in the direction of propagation, indicating the presence of spin angular momentum. The finite wave structure provides insight into the spin of circularly polarized waves, analogous to the spin of photons.
Kostik
Messages
274
Reaction score
32
TL;DR Summary
An infinite circularly-polarized plane wave transports no angular momentum in the direction of propagation, but a wave of finite extent does do edge effects. How to calculate the electric and magnetic fields in such a wave packet?
In an infinite plane wave propagating in the ##z## direction, the momentum density is ##\mathbf{p}=(4π)^{-1}(\mathbf{E} × \mathbf{B})## which points in the ##z## direction; therefore, the angular momentum density about the ##z##-axis ##\mathbf{L} = \mathbf{r} × \mathbf{p}## has no ##z##-component. (Naturally, the total angular momentum in any volume which is axially symmetric about the ##z##-axis is zero. In a volume element ##dV## located a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the ##z##-axis, the angular momentum density ##\mathbf{L} = \mathbf{r} × \mathbf{p}## is orbital angular momentum, as it arises purely from the linear momentum ##\mathbf{p}##.) Thus, even a circularly polarized wave, being a sum of linearly polarized waves, has no ##z##-angular momentum density, and therefore does not exert a torque on charged matter.

Now consider a plane wave such as $$\mathbf{E} = E_0 \cos⁡(\omega t - kz) \hat{\bf{x}}, \quad\quad
\mathbf{B} = E_0 \cos⁡(\omega t - kz) \hat{\bf{y}} $$ of finite transverse extent, occupying a cylinder of radius ##R## around the ##z##-axis. In the plane ##z=0##, the electric and magnetic fields point in the ##\hat{\bf{x}}## and ##\hat{\bf{y}}## directions, but approaching the wave border at ##r=(x^2+y^2 )^2=R## the field strength rapidly drops to zero.

Suppose the fields have constant magnitude when ##r≤R-ε##, attenuate in the annulus ##R-ε<r<R##, and vanish when ##r>R##. In the plane ##z=2\pi/\omega## the electric and magnetic fields point in the ##-\hat{\bf{x}}## and ##-\hat{\bf{y}}## directions. Therefore, the field lines in the planes ##z=0## and ##z=2\pi/\omega## must connect with each other in the region ##0<z<2\pi/\omega## to form closed loops. (The same is true of all pairs of planes ##z=z_0## and ##z=z_0+2\pi/\omega##.) The exact shape of the field lines depends upon how the field strength is attenuated near the wave boundary, but the ##\mathbf{E}## and ##\mathbf{B}## fields will have a ##z##-component in the region ##R-ε<r<R##.

Thus, there will be some transverse energy flux. In a circularly polarized wave, the field vectors have constant magnitude and rotation, so the transverse energy flux in the annular region will be constant in magnitude and orientation (clockwise or counterclockwise) for a given ##r## in the annulus. As a result, a circularly polarized plane wave of finite extent transports angular momentum in the direction of propagation, owing to the transverse energy flow near its edge. Such a wave will possess spin angular momentum.

Jackson's "Electrodynamics" (2nd edition), p. 333, problem 7.20, says that the electric field in such a circularly polarized wave is $$\mathbf{E}(x,y,z,t) = \left[ E_0(x,y) ( \hat{\bf{x}} \pm i\hat{\bf{y}} ) + \frac{i}{k}\left( \frac{\partial E_0}{\partial x} \pm i\frac{\partial E_0}{\partial y} \right) \hat{\bf{z}} \right] e^{-i(\omega t - kz)}, \quad\quad \mathbf{B} = \mp i\mathbf{E} .$$ Setting ##E_0(x,y)=## constant, the ##\hat{\bf{z}}## term vanishes, and we are left with $$\mathbf{E}(x,y,z,t) = E_0(x,y) ( \hat{\bf{x}} \pm i\hat{\bf{y}} ) e^{-i(\omega t - kz)} $$ which is the correct expression for right- and left- circularly polarized plane waves. (We always take the real part and discard the imaginary part to obtain the physical wave.)

How does one obtain Jackson's fields? We have no charges or currents, so only Maxwell's homogeneous equations apply. The issue, of course, is the border area of the wave with finite transverse width, where ##E_0(x,y)## tapers off from some constant value throughout the "middle" of the wave quickly to zero.

This is an important idea, because the finite wave gives meaning to the "spin" of a circularly polarized wave, with a direct analogy to the spin of the photons which comprise the wave.

Thanks for an assist here.

Edit: I think maybe it's as simple as calculating ##F_{\mu\nu} = A_{\mu,\nu}-A_{\nu,\mu}## and picking off the ##E## and ##B## field components.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Solved it!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top