Electric field in nonmagnetic material given a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving the determination of electric field strength E in a nonmagnetic material subjected to a specified magnetic field. The original poster struggles with applying Faraday's Law, resulting in confusing outputs that do not yield meaningful solutions. Participants emphasize the need to correct the given formula due to dimensional inconsistencies in the exponential and cosine functions. They suggest working symbolically before substituting numerical values to avoid confusion. The conversation highlights the importance of ensuring proper dimensional analysis in electromagnetic problems.
PeterV
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Electric field from magnetic field
Relevant Equations
H = 50⋅exp(−100⋅x)⋅cos(2π⋅10⁹⋅t − 200⋅x)⋅ŷ
Hello, I am stuck on a problem that I don't quite understand, which looks like this:

"Given a nonmagnetic material with the magnetic field

H = 50exp(−100⋅x)cos(2π10⁹⋅t − 200⋅x)ŷ

determine the electric field strength E"

I don't understand how I am supposed to find the solution for this problem;
I have tried using Faraday's Law, but this only gives me some weird curl vectors that give me meaningless solutions, like partial derivatives of constants and things like that, and I cannot find any relationship between these fields that actually allow me to solve for E in a sensible way.
What is it that I am missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a good exercise to figure out, whether this problem is complete, i.e., if you can reconstruct the electromagnetic field ##(\vec{E},\vec{B})## from only the given information.

First of all, you should correct the given formula, which is inacceptable, because there are dimensionful quantities in exp and cos, and the argument of the latter adds a time to a length.

Last but not least: It's way more convenient to work with symbols first and only at the very end put numbers (or physical quantities with the correction dimensions!).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top