- #1
AmagicalFishy
- 50
- 1
Homework Statement
Consider the triangular-shaped wire in the picture. The base is of length 2a and is along the y-axis, and the two sides are of length 3a each. The wire is uniformly charged with charge density (per line) [itex]\lambda[/itex].
Find the electrostatic field at all points [itex]\vec{x}[/itex] = x[itex]\hat{i}[/itex], where x [itex]\in[/itex] [a; 2a]. There is no need to evaluate any integral. Your final answer must specify the components of the electric field through integrals such that (assuming the numerical values of the integrals are known) the final answer depends only on [itex]\lambda[/itex], a and the constant [itex]\epsilon _0[/itex].
The associated picture is:
Homework Equations
[tex]
\vec{E}(x) = \frac{\vec{F}(x)}{q} \\
\lambda = \frac{q}{8a}
[/tex]
The Attempt at a Solution
Most of this problem came pretty easy to me. Some symmetry arguments made, etc.—I found the e-field contribution of the base (w/ length 2a), and proceeded to try to find the e-field contribution of one of the sides (I know the [itex]\hat{j}[/itex] components cancel, and the [itex]\hat{i}[/itex] component is just double of the contribution of one of the sides.
The issue comes up when trying to generalize the distance and direction from some point between x = a and x = 2a and a point on the diagonal wire.
My process begins like this ([itex]\hat{r}[/itex] is the direction from a point on the wire to the x-point, and r is the distance):
[tex]
\vec{E}(x) = \sum{\vec{dE}(x)} = \frac{1}{q} \sum{\vec{dF}(x)}\\
{\vec{dF}(x)} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon _0} \frac{(q)(dq)}{r^2} \hat{r} \\
dq = \lambda 8ada - \text{Where "da" is an infinitesimal portion of the wire}
[/tex]
Now, I've got to find r and [itex]\hat{r}[/itex]—and relate da to that. This is where I get snagged up.
x is a fixed point between x = a and x = 2a, and xw is the x-coordinate of a point on the wire.
[itex]\hat{r}[/itex], the direction from some point on the x-axis and a point on the wire, is:
[tex]
r = \frac{(x, 0) - (x_w, y)}{\sqrt{(x-x_w)^2 + y^2}} = \frac{<x - x_w, -y>}{\sqrt{(x-x_w)^2 + y^2}} = \frac{(x-x_w)\hat{i}}{\sqrt{(x-x_w)^2 + y^2}} + \frac{-y\hat{j}}{\sqrt{(x-x_w)^2 + y^2}} = \frac{(x-x_w)\hat{i}}{\sqrt{(x-x_w)^2 + y^2}}
[/tex]
The last step is due to the fact that the [itex]\hat{j}[/itex] components cancel one another. First, is this... correct? Does it make sense to do that, and, eventually, have to integrate with respect to xw? Or am I over-complicating things?
Also, I can't figure out for the life of me what da is. I know it's some infinitesimal amount of wire, but how can I express that mathematically? I end up doing something like [itex]\sqrt{dx^2 + dy^2}[/itex] which I'm pretty sure is wrong.
Maybe... use the angle made with the vector from the point to the wire and the x-axis, and use that angle to express the infinitesimal length of the wire (angle multiplied by arclength)? I feel like I'm missing something very simple here (there usually is -_-), but I've been mulling over this problem for a while and can't figure it out.
(I figured out the e-field due to the base simply enough; Pythagoras made that one easy for me. :D)
Last edited: