- #1
exitwound
- 292
- 1
I have attempted to find solutions for this netwide and can't find one that actually satisfies my questions so I am asking here. I am returning to school at the age of 32 and am trying to pre-learn some material before jumping back into the physics classes I need. A lot of the concepts are fuzzy but I'm trying.
A thin nonconducting rod of finite length [tex]l[/tex] carries a total charge [tex]q[/tex], spread uniformly along it. Show that E at point P (y units above the rod) on the perpendicular bisector is given by
[tex]E=(\frac{q}{2y\pi\epsilon}) (\frac{1}{\sqrt{l^2+4y^2}})[/tex]
[tex]E=\frac{kQ}{d^2}[/tex]
[tex]\lambda=\frac{Q}{l}[/tex]
I've attempted this for 3 days and I can't figure it out.
I started by drawing the diagram and looking at the resultant forces acting on P from the rod beneath it.
Step 1.)
If [tex]E=\frac{kQ}{d^2}[/tex] , then [tex]dE=\frac{kdQ}{d^2}[/tex]
Step 2.)
The resulting field will be perpendicular to the rod's length. The field will be pointing upward because any dx segments evaluated from the right of the bisector will be canceled by the -dx segment on the left of the bisector.
Each dx segment of the length of the rod would produce a field at P of [tex]dE=\frac{kdQ}{d^2}[/tex]
The components of this resulting E vector are [tex]dE[/tex]y=[tex]dEcos\theta[/tex] and [tex]dE[/tex]x=[tex]dEsin\theta[/tex]
Step 3.)
The resulting upward E-field is the sum of all the dx segments along the rod.
[tex]dE[/tex]y=[tex]\int{}{dEy}[/tex]
[tex]dE=\int_0^l{cos\theta dE}[/tex]
Step 4.)
if [tex]dE=\frac{kdQ}{r^2}[/tex], we substitute in what we know.
[tex]dQ=\lambda dx[/tex] because Q charge over L length is the charge density along a length dx of the rod.
[tex]dE=\frac{k\lambda dx}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]
[tex]E=\int_0^l{cos\theta \frac{k\lambda}{x^2+y^2}dx}[/tex]
[tex]E=k\lambda\int_0^l{cos\theta \frac{1}{x^2+y^2}dx}[/tex]
Step 5.)
This is where I fall apart. I have an equation, which is hopefully right, describing the Electric field at point P. If this isn't right so far, then I am completely clueless to where I made the mistake. Since [tex]\theta[/tex] and x are not independent, I have to change one into the other. I can use [tex]x=ytan\theta[/tex] and [tex]dx=ysec^2\theta d\theta[/tex] I believe. (I looked up that derivative as I can't remember how it's derived.) and substitute these into the equation above but from there, it gets really really messy and I can't get through it.
Have I done everything right so far? If so, where do I go? If not, where has the logic failed me and am I destined to fail electricity & magnetism in the fall semester?
Thanks.
Homework Statement
A thin nonconducting rod of finite length [tex]l[/tex] carries a total charge [tex]q[/tex], spread uniformly along it. Show that E at point P (y units above the rod) on the perpendicular bisector is given by
[tex]E=(\frac{q}{2y\pi\epsilon}) (\frac{1}{\sqrt{l^2+4y^2}})[/tex]
Homework Equations
[tex]E=\frac{kQ}{d^2}[/tex]
[tex]\lambda=\frac{Q}{l}[/tex]
The Attempt at a Solution
I've attempted this for 3 days and I can't figure it out.
I started by drawing the diagram and looking at the resultant forces acting on P from the rod beneath it.
Step 1.)
If [tex]E=\frac{kQ}{d^2}[/tex] , then [tex]dE=\frac{kdQ}{d^2}[/tex]
Step 2.)
The resulting field will be perpendicular to the rod's length. The field will be pointing upward because any dx segments evaluated from the right of the bisector will be canceled by the -dx segment on the left of the bisector.
Each dx segment of the length of the rod would produce a field at P of [tex]dE=\frac{kdQ}{d^2}[/tex]
The components of this resulting E vector are [tex]dE[/tex]y=[tex]dEcos\theta[/tex] and [tex]dE[/tex]x=[tex]dEsin\theta[/tex]
Step 3.)
The resulting upward E-field is the sum of all the dx segments along the rod.
[tex]dE[/tex]y=[tex]\int{}{dEy}[/tex]
[tex]dE=\int_0^l{cos\theta dE}[/tex]
Step 4.)
if [tex]dE=\frac{kdQ}{r^2}[/tex], we substitute in what we know.
[tex]dQ=\lambda dx[/tex] because Q charge over L length is the charge density along a length dx of the rod.
[tex]dE=\frac{k\lambda dx}{x^2+y^2}[/tex]
[tex]E=\int_0^l{cos\theta \frac{k\lambda}{x^2+y^2}dx}[/tex]
[tex]E=k\lambda\int_0^l{cos\theta \frac{1}{x^2+y^2}dx}[/tex]
Step 5.)
This is where I fall apart. I have an equation, which is hopefully right, describing the Electric field at point P. If this isn't right so far, then I am completely clueless to where I made the mistake. Since [tex]\theta[/tex] and x are not independent, I have to change one into the other. I can use [tex]x=ytan\theta[/tex] and [tex]dx=ysec^2\theta d\theta[/tex] I believe. (I looked up that derivative as I can't remember how it's derived.) and substitute these into the equation above but from there, it gets really really messy and I can't get through it.
Have I done everything right so far? If so, where do I go? If not, where has the logic failed me and am I destined to fail electricity & magnetism in the fall semester?
Thanks.