Electric force between two halves of a sphere

In summary: This equation is from another problem, it looked useful so:the force per unit area on a charged slab thickness a is:integral from 0 to a of rho times the electric field times dxrho is the volume charge density…What I tried to do is make a cylindrical column from the north pole to the center. …I don't think there's any convenient short-cut for this problem …I think you'll just have to integrate the (component of) force from each point on one sphere to each point on the other sphere. :redface:Okay.I tried doing that but it seems as though it gets too
  • #1
darkSun
53
0

Homework Statement


(I'll be using k=1/4pi*permittivity of free space)
Find the net force that the southern hemisphere of a uniformly charged sphere exerts on the northern hemisphere. Express the answer in terms of the radius R and the total charge Q.

I tried to show how I attempted the problem, but trying to follow that, especially written like this, may be inconvenient, so if someone could lead me in the right direction that'd cool. The way I tried it may not be correct anyway.

Homework Equations


This equation is from another problem, it looked useful so:
the force per unit area on a charged slab thickness a is:
integral from 0 to a of rho times the electric field times dx
rho is the volume charge density


The Attempt at a Solution


What I tried to do is make a cylindrical column from the north pole to the center. I then used the above formula, and got the force per unit area to be 3kQ^2 / 8piR^4. To get this I integrated Q over the volume of a sphere, which is rho, times the formula for the electric field of a uniformly charged sphere inside the sphere, kQr/R^3. Then, I multiplied by a surface area element in spherical coordinates (with phi as azimuthal angle), r^2 sin phi dphi dtheta. Then I multiplied by cos phi, because I want the upward force component. I integrated this over the top half of the sphere (phi goes from 0 to pi/2, and theta from 0 to 2pi).

I obtained 3kQ^2/8R^2, while the book says the right answer is half that!
It's from Griffith's Intro to Electrodynamics, problem 2.44 if that helps.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi darkSun! :smile:

(have a pi: π and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
darkSun said:
Find the net force that the southern hemisphere of a uniformly charged sphere exerts on the northern hemisphere. Express the answer in terms of the radius R and the total charge Q.

the force per unit area on a charged slab thickness a is:
integral from 0 to a of rho times the electric field times dx
rho is the volume charge density

What I tried to do is make a cylindrical column from the north pole to the center. …

I don't think there's any convenient short-cut for this problem …

I think you'll just have to integrate the (component of) force from each point on one sphere to each point on the other sphere. :redface:
 
  • #3
Okay. I tried doing that but it seems as though it gets too complicated. It's hard to integrate the resulting expression in rectangular coordinates, and in spherical I can't even get an expression for the points from one hemisphere to another. I didn't think the problem was this crazy lol. Thanks for your help tiny-tim.
 
  • #4
I'm not sure if you are still working on this problem, but in case you are, you were very close with your first attempt. There is nothing wrong with using the electric field due to the entire sphere [itex]\textbf{E}_{total}[/itex] (as opposed to the field due to just the southern hemisphere [itex]\textbf{E}_{S}[/itex]) because when you integrate over the northern hemisphere the part of the field from that hemisphere ([itex]\textbf{E}_{N}[/itex]) will not exert a force on it.

In other words, you want to calculate

[tex]\int_{\text{N-Hemi}} \rho\textbf{E}_{S}d\tau[/tex]

but since an object can't exert a force on itself, you know that

[tex]\int_{\text{N-Hemi}} \rho\textbf{E}_{N}d\tau=0[/tex]

and so there is no harm in adding that to the integral you want to calculate:

[tex]\textbf{F}=\int_{\text{N-Hemi}} \rho\textbf{E}_{S}d\tau=\int_{\text{N-Hemi}} \rho\textbf{E}_{S}d\tau+\int_{\text{N-Hemi}} \rho\textbf{E}_{N}d\tau=\int_{\text{N-Hemi}} \rho(\textbf{E}_{S}+\textbf{E}_{N})d\tau=\int_{\text{N-Hemi}} \rho\textbf{E}_{total}d\tau[/tex]

The problem with your first attempt was that you were only integrating over the outer surface of the northern hemisphere instead of integrating over the volume of the hemisphere (the southern hemi will exert a force on every piece of the hemisphere, not just the pieces on the outer surface).
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Yes, this problem has still been bothering me. Hmm, when you phrase it like that, gabbagabbahey, it seems so obvious! But it's still a useful thing to realize.

Anyway, I did the integral the way you said to, and I got 3Q^2 / 64*pi*epsilon*R^2. That is the book's answer with an extra 4 in the denominator. T_T

I also don't think my first attempt was watertight, but what I was trying to do was not to figure out force per area, but force per cylinder going through the center, and adding up the cylinders. Eh, if it's not right, it's not right.
 
  • #6
gabbagabbahey said:
… an object can't exert a force on itself …

hey, that's neat! :biggrin:
 
  • #7
There is a trick to this problem.

First the electric field of a charge ball of radius 1 is:
[tex]E(r)=
\begin{cases}
\dfrac{k Q}{r^2} & r > 1 \\
k Q r & r <1
\end{cases}[/tex]

Suppose you cut a sphere along the x-y plane into two hemispheres then displace them by a small distance dz.

This is do not actually change the electric field much, except now one will have some additional electric field on the x-y plane. The energy stored in the additional field is how much work done to pull them apart by dz.

The force is of course just dW/dz.

[tex]\begin{aligned}
dW = \frac{1}{8\pi k} \int E^2 dV
& = \frac{1}{8\pi k} \int E^2(r) 2\pi r dr dz \\
& = \frac{k Q^2}{4} \left(
\int_0^1 r^3 dr + \int_{1}^{\infty} r^{-3} dr
\right) dz \\
F_z = \frac{dW}{dz} &= \frac{k Q^2}{4}
\left( \frac{1}{4} + \frac{1}{2} \right)
=\frac{3 k Q^2}{16}
\end{aligned}[/tex]

By the way, I think the "supposed way" to do this Griffith problem is to use the formula for surface pressure of a conductor earlier in the chapter and add up the integrate z-component of the force on the base and the side of a hemisphere. Be ware, you need to make a correct physical argument about the direction of the pressure/force.
 
Last edited:

Related to Electric force between two halves of a sphere

1. What is the "electric force" between two halves of a sphere?

The electric force between two halves of a sphere refers to the attractive or repulsive force that exists between two charged halves of a sphere, due to the presence of electric charges on each half.

2. How is the "electric force" calculated between two halves of a sphere?

The electric force between two halves of a sphere can be calculated using Coulomb's Law, which states that the force between two charges is directly proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

3. What factors affect the "electric force" between two halves of a sphere?

The electric force between two halves of a sphere is affected by the magnitude of the charges on each half, the distance between the two halves, and the relative orientation of the charges (i.e. whether they are positive or negative).

4. Can the "electric force" between two halves of a sphere be attractive and repulsive at the same time?

No, the electric force between two halves of a sphere can only be either attractive or repulsive, depending on the relative charges of each half. Like charges (positive-positive or negative-negative) will repel each other, while opposite charges (positive-negative or negative-positive) will attract each other.

5. How does the "electric force" between two halves of a sphere compare to the electric force between two point charges?

The electric force between two halves of a sphere follows the same principles as the electric force between two point charges, however, the calculation is slightly different due to the spherical shape of the charges. Additionally, the electric force between two halves of a sphere will vary depending on the relative orientation of the charges, whereas the electric force between two point charges will always be attractive or repulsive based on the charges themselves.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
237
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
392
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
281
Replies
1
Views
332
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
857
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
579
Replies
17
Views
344
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
890
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
36
Views
590
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
289
Back
Top